State of Kerala vs SUMESH K. V (A — 300421/2020
Case under Ipc \ Section 143,147,148,447,450,294(b),506(1),364,341,323,324,307,302,109,201,118,120B,149. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLER570000032020
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
300421/2020
Filing Date
12-06-2020
Registration No
300421/2020
Registration Date
04-08-2020
Court
Additional Special Sessions Court SPE CBI -III,Ernakulam
Judge
1-Spl.Judge CBI-III
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. Navas
Respondent(s)
SUMESH K. V (A
Advocate - NICHOLAS JOSEPH
GANESAN P (A
ANOOP (A
VIJESH @ BABUTTY (A
PRAKASAN K (A
UMESHAN V (A
PAVITHRAN P (A
LATHEESH C (A
MANOHARAN P. V (A
N. P. DINESAN @ MINADINESAN (A
C. N. MOHANAN (A
BIJUMON (A
N. NIDHIN (A
E. P. RADHAKRISHNAN (A
SHIJIN MOHAN @ SHIJIN (A
K. V. SAJITH (A
SUDHAKARAN @ CONDUCTOR SUDHAKARAN (A
NAVIN N. P (A
SHYAMJITH (A
SAREESH A. (A
SHAJI K. V (A
PRAKASAN MUTHUVANI (A
AJAYAKUMAR N. P. @ AJAYAN (A
RAJEEVAN P. (A
V. V. MOHANAN (A
PURUSHOTHAMAN M. V. @ PURUSHU (A
P. K. AJITH KUMAR (A
P. P. SURESAN (A
K. BABU (A
U. V. VENU (A
A. V. BABU (A
P. JAYARAJAN (A
T. V. RAJESH (A
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Spl.Judge CBI-III
Call on
Call on
Call on
Call on
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Call on | |
| 27-03-2026 | Call on | |
| 26-03-2026 | Call on | |
| 25-03-2026 | Call on | |
| 13-03-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court dismissed the prosecution's Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (CMP 541/2025) seeking to recall and examine witness CW.3, N.K. Haris, who had been previously given up by the prosecution. The Special Judge held that examining an occurrence witness at such a belated stage—after 26 prosecution witnesses had already testified and the accused had formulated their defense—would cause serious prejudice to the accused, particularly since the prosecution had made no effort to secure the witness's presence coercively before abandoning him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court dismissed the prosecution's Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (CMP 541/2025) seeking to recall and examine witness CW.3, N.K. Haris, who had been previously given up by the prosecution. The Special Judge held that examining an occurrence witness at such a belated stage—after 26 prosecution witnesses had already testified and the accused had formulated their defense—would cause serious prejudice to the accused, particularly since the prosecution had made no effort to secure the witness's presence coercively before abandoning him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts