State of Kerala (Police) vs MIDHUN P K Advocate - ROOPESH N R — 14/2023
Case under Information Technology Act Section 66(E),67. Status: Appearance of Accused. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLER550000492023
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2023
Filing Number
200049/2023
Filing Date
12-01-2023
Registration No
14/2023
Registration Date
12-01-2023
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court, Kolenchery
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kolenchery
FIR Details
FIR Number
372
Police Station
Kunnathu Nadu
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MIDHUN P K Advocate - ROOPESH N R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kolenchery
Appearance of Accused
For framing charge
For framing charge
Appearance of Accused
Appearance of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance of Accused | |
| 09-01-2026 | For framing charge | |
| 28-10-2025 | For framing charge | |
| 19-08-2025 | Appearance of Accused | |
| 29-04-2025 | Appearance of Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (CMP) filed by Midhun P K seeking discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C. in a case involving alleged extortion, criminal intimidation, and IT Act violations (Sections 506, 509 IPC; 66E, 67 IT Act) has been dismissed. The court found sufficient prima facie materials on record, including witness statements, to establish the accused's involvement in recording and sharing an obscene video, thus warranting continuation of criminal prosecution against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (CMP) filed by Midhun P K seeking discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C. in a case involving alleged extortion, criminal intimidation, and IT Act violations (Sections 506, 509 IPC; 66E, 67 IT Act) has been dismissed. The court found sufficient prima facie materials on record, including witness statements, to establish the accused's involvement in recording and sharing an obscene video, thus warranting continuation of criminal prosecution against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts