Babu K.V vs Thankappan — 100027/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26andorderVIIrule1ofCPC. Status: Call with IA. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER540000372014

Call with IA

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

Filing Number

1000353/2014

Filing Date

04-04-2014

Registration No

100027/2014

Registration Date

04-04-2014

Court

Munsiff Court, Kolenchery

Judge

1-Munsiff Kolenchery

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26andorderVIIrule1ofCPC
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Section Babu K.VThankappan

Petitioner(s)

Babu K.V

Adv. Mathew P Paul and Finimol TP

Arun Babu

Adv. Mathew P Paul and Finimol T.P

Respondent(s)

Thankappan

Karthika

Chandran

Bindu Thankappan

Adv. K. C Paulose

Aswathy Thankappan

Adv. K.C Paulose

Athira Thankappan

Adv. Paulose K.C

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff Kolenchery

07-03-2026

Call with IA

13-02-2026

Call with IA

16-01-2026

Call with IA

05-12-2025

Call with IA

10-11-2025

Call with IA

Interim Orders

30-07-2018
Judgement

Summary The suit for boundary fixation, recovery of possession, and injunctions was allowed in favor of the plaintiffs. The court fixed the western boundary of one property and the southern and eastern boundaries of another property as per the survey sketch, ordered the defendants to demolish an encroaching granite wall (or face removal at their expense), granted recovery of possession of the encroached land to the plaintiffs, and issued permanent prohibitory injunctions restraining the defendants from trespassing or obstructing boundary construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The suit for boundary fixation, recovery of possession, and injunctions was allowed in favor of the plaintiffs. The court fixed the western boundary of one property and the southern and eastern boundaries of another property as per the survey sketch, ordered the defendants to demolish an encroaching granite wall (or face removal at their expense), granted recovery of possession of the encroached land to the plaintiffs, and issued permanent prohibitory injunctions restraining the defendants from trespassing or obstructing boundary construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Kolenchery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case