Roy K Varghese vs kerala state electricity board , ltd. KSEB. Advocate - K. R Sunilkumar — 298/2025

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 26 R/w order 7 rule 1. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER510006502025

Objection

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

Filing Number

635/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

298/2025

Registration Date

18-10-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 26 R/w order 7 rule 1
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section Roy K Varghese
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section Roy K Varghese
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Petition to Accept Photocopy Section Roy K Varghese
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Petition to Set Aside Order / Decree Section kerala state electricity board , ltd. KSEB.Roy K Varghese

Petitioner(s)

Roy K Varghese

Adv. Joshy Joseph

Respondent(s)

kerala state electricity board , ltd. KSEB. Advocate - K. R Sunilkumar

executive engineer

Adv. K. R Sunilkumar

assistant engineer

Adv. K. R Sunilkumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

07-03-2026

Objection

28-01-2026

BCF and steps

18-10-2025

For return of summons

Interim Orders

18-10-2025
Order

Summary: The Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha granted an ad-interim ex-parte prohibitory injunction restraining the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) from installing any new electrical equipment in the petitioner's scheduled property for electrical charging purposes. The court found the petitioner made out a prima facie case and deemed immediate relief necessary to prevent frustration of the petition. The case is adjourned to 05.11.2025 for return of notice to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha granted an ad-interim ex-parte prohibitory injunction restraining the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) from installing any new electrical equipment in the petitioner's scheduled property for electrical charging purposes. The court found the petitioner made out a prima facie case and deemed immediate relief necessary to prevent frustration of the petition. The case is adjourned to 05.11.2025 for return of notice to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case