Roy K Varghese vs kerala state electricity board , ltd. KSEB. Advocate - K. R Sunilkumar — 298/2025

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 26 R/w order 7 rule 1. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

Objection Next hearing 19-May-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER510006502025

Filing Number

635/2025

Filing Date

17-Oct-2025

Registration No

298/2025

Registration Date

18-Oct-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 26 R/w order 7 rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Roy K Varghese

    Adv. Joshy Joseph

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.kerala state electricity board , ltd. KSEB. Advocate - K. R Sunilkumar

  2. 2.executive engineer

    Adv. K. R Sunilkumar

  3. 3.assistant engineer

    Adv. K. R Sunilkumar

Case History

  1. 19-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Objection

    Munsiff

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff

  4. 18-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha granted an ad-interim ex-parte prohibitory injunction restraining the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) from installing any new electrical equipment in the petitioner's scheduled property for electrical charging purposes. The court found the petitioner made out a prima facie case and deemed immediate relief necessary to prevent frustration of the petition. The case is adjourned to 05.11.2025 for return of notice to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 18-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 298/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha granted an ad-interim ex-parte prohibitory injunction restraining the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) from installing any new electrical equipment in the petitioner's scheduled property for electrical charging purposes. The court found the petitioner made out a prima facie case and deemed immediate relief necessary to prevent frustration of the petition. The case is adjourned to 05.11.2025 for return of notice to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case