Sweenly V Sunny vs Prince P Mathew — 241/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Injuction suit. Status: Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER510005522025

Filing Number

578/2025

Filing Date

19-Aug-2025

Registration No

241/2025

Registration Date

19-Aug-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Injuction suit

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sweenly V Sunny

    Adv. Sanel Cherian

  2. 2.Hardly V Sunny

    Adv. Sanel Cherian

  3. 3.Jessymole

    Adv. Sanel Cherian

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prince P Mathew

  2. 2.Aruna Mathew

  3. 3.pratheesh mathew

    Adv. Joshy Joseph,Arya Biju

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC

    Munsiff

  3. 21-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  4. 03-Jan-2026

    Return of notice

    Munsiff

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Court of Munsiff Muvattupuzha granted an ad-interim ex-parte prohibitory injunction restraining the respondents from making construction by encroaching into the plaintiffs' scheduled properties. The court found the petitioners had made out a prima facie case and determined that issuing notice would cause delay that could frustrate the petition's purpose. The case was adjourned to 10.09.2025 for return of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 19-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 241/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of Munsiff Muvattupuzha granted an ad-interim ex-parte prohibitory injunction restraining the respondents from making construction by encroaching into the plaintiffs' scheduled properties. The court found the petitioners had made out a prima facie case and determined that issuing notice would cause delay that could frustrate the petition's purpose. The case was adjourned to 10.09.2025 for return of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case