Rajeena vs Therasa Jose Advocate - Suraj Krishna B.S — 300007/2022
Case under Lease and Rent Control Act 1965 Section 11. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLER510004152022
Filing Number
524/2022
Filing Date
18-Jul-2022
Registration No
300007/2022
Registration Date
18-Jul-2022
Court
Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-Munsiff
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajeena
Adv. Sherman A.George
Respondent(s)
-
1.Therasa Jose Advocate - Suraj Krishna B.S
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
28-Mar-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff
-
21-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
17-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
09-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
24-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
17-Jan-2026
Objection
Munsiff
-
14-Jan-2026
Objection
Munsiff
-
20-Dec-2025
Objection
Munsiff
-
08-Dec-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
20-Nov-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
07-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The petition to amend the objection in an eviction case (R.C.P. 7/2022) was allowed with conditions. The petitioner, Theresa Jose, sought to introduce a "permanent licensee" defense to counter the landlord's eviction petition based on non-payment of rent. Although the court found such amendments permissible under CPC principles (citing *Benjeena P. J. v. C. P. Pappachan*), it imposed a penal cost of ₹4,000 to be paid within 10 days, finding that the petitioner filed this amendment belatedly with apparent intent to delay proceedings. The case was called for further hearing on 20.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Nov-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
26-Sep-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
15-Sep-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
11-Sep-2025
Adjourned
Munsiff
-
26-Aug-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
01-Aug-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
30-Jun-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
17-Jun-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
10-Jun-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
19-May-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
08-Apr-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
02-Apr-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
24-Mar-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
19-Mar-2025
For hearing on IA
Munsiff
-
18-Mar-2025
For hearing on IA
Munsiff
-
15-Mar-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
14-Mar-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
24-Feb-2025
Listed to
Munsiff
-
14-Feb-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
17-Jan-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
03-Dec-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
24-Oct-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
15-Oct-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
23-Sep-2024
Listed to
Munsiff
-
03-Sep-2024
Listed to
Munsiff
-
12-Aug-2024
Listed to
Munsiff
-
23-Jul-2024
Listed to
Munsiff
-
22-Jul-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
20-Jul-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
01-Jul-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
29-Jun-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
28-Jun-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
22-Jun-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
10-Jun-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
07-Jun-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
04-Jun-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
11-Apr-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
03-Apr-2024
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
27-Feb-2024
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
17-Feb-2024
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
05-Feb-2024
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
09-Jan-2024
Objection
Munsiff
-
03-Jan-2024
Objection
Munsiff
-
07-Dec-2023
Objection
Munsiff
-
20-Nov-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
08-Nov-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
28-Oct-2023
Objection
Munsiff
-
04-Oct-2023
Objection
Munsiff
-
19-Aug-2023
Objection
Munsiff
-
03-Aug-2023
Further evidence
Munsiff
-
18-Jan-2023
Listed to
Munsiff
-
23-Nov-2022
For Steps
Munsiff
-
11-Oct-2022
Objection
Munsiff
-
19-Aug-2022
Objection
Munsiff
-
18-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 300007/2022
Summary: The petition to amend the objection in an eviction case (R.C.P. 7/2022) was allowed with conditions. The petitioner, Theresa Jose, sought to introduce a "permanent licensee" defense to counter the landlord's eviction petition based on non-payment of rent. Although the court found such amendments permissible under CPC principles (citing *Benjeena P. J. v. C. P. Pappachan*), it imposed a penal cost of ₹4,000 to be paid within 10 days, finding that the petitioner filed this amendment belatedly with apparent intent to delay proceedings. The case was called for further hearing on 20.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts