Jibi Padmanabhan vs Paulose Advocate - THOMAS A C, DIANA VARGHESE — 300139/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section 26 of order 7 rule 1. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER510003022025

Objection

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

10-04-2025

Filing Number

339/2025

Filing Date

11-04-2025

Registration No

300139/2025

Registration Date

11-04-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section section 26 of order 7 rule 1
IA/4/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section Jibi PadmanabhanPaulose
IA/5/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section Jibi PadmanabhanPaulose
IA/1/2026 Classification : Injunction Application Section PauloseJibi Padmanabhan

Petitioner(s)

Jibi Padmanabhan

Adv. RAMESH N

Respondent(s)

Paulose Advocate - THOMAS A C, DIANA VARGHESE

Saramma

Adv. THOMAS A C,DIANA VARGHESE

Saji Varkey

Adv. THOMAS A C,DIANA VARGHESE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

09-03-2026

Objection

11-12-2025

Written Statement

27-11-2025

Orders in IA

20-11-2025

For further hearing

14-11-2025

Objection to CR

Interim Orders

03-11-2025
Judgement
11-12-2025
Order
11-12-2025
Order
11-12-2025
Order

Summary: The Court of Munsiff, Muvattupuzha dismissed both interim applications (I.A. 1/2025 and I.A. 5/2025) seeking temporary prohibitory injunctions in a property dispute case. The Court held that the plaintiff had no prima facie case for relief regarding a disputed road (B schedule road) and that the defendants failed to establish grounds for injunction to prevent timber transportation, as no evidence showed such use would damage the road itself. The Court noted that the plaintiff's father had omitted similar relief claims in an earlier dismissed suit (O.S. 531/2013) and observed inconsistencies in the plaintiff's stance regarding the road's location and status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of Munsiff, Muvattupuzha dismissed both interim applications (I.A. 1/2025 and I.A. 5/2025) seeking temporary prohibitory injunctions in a property dispute case. The Court held that the plaintiff had no prima facie case for relief regarding a disputed road (B schedule road) and that the defendants failed to establish grounds for injunction to prevent timber transportation, as no evidence showed such use would damage the road itself. The Court noted that the plaintiff's father had omitted similar relief claims in an earlier dismissed suit (O.S. 531/2013) and observed inconsistencies in the plaintiff's stance regarding the road's location and status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case