K J Mathew vs Georgekutty D. Kochumuttom Advocate - PAUL, BABITHA T H, BABITHA T HDAYANA PAUL, — 300115/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section26OVIIR1TO7. Status: Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER510002712025

Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC

Next Hearing

20th May 2026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2025

Filing Number

304/2025

Filing Date

01-04-2025

Registration No

300115/2025

Registration Date

01-04-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Section26OVIIR1TO7
IA/8/2025 Classification : Section K J MathewGeorgekutty D. Kochumuttom
IA/9/2025 Classification : Section K J MathewGeorgekutty D. Kochumuttom
IA/10/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section K J MathewGeorgekutty D. Kochumuttom
IA/11/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section K J MathewGeorgekutty D. Kochumuttom
IA/12/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section K J MathewGeorgekutty D. Kochumuttom

Petitioner(s)

K J Mathew

Adv. S Asokan

Gracy Mathew

Adv. S Asokan

Respondent(s)

Georgekutty D. Kochumuttom Advocate - PAUL, BABITHA T H, BABITHA T HDAYANA PAUL,

Dolphy Ajo

Adv. PAUL,BABITHA T H DAYANA PAUL

Alphy D. Kochumuttom

Adv. PAUL,BABITHA T H DAYANA PAUL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

09-03-2026

Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC

11-12-2025

Written Statement

08-12-2025

Order/Judgement

25-11-2025

Orders in IA

21-11-2025

For commission report

Interim Orders

11-09-2025
Order
11-12-2025
Order

Summary The Court of Munsiff, Muvattupuzha allowed the petition in part and granted a temporary prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from altering the present nature and position of the C schedule road as documented in commissioned reports. The court noted the dispute involves a claimed easement right through defendants' property, but declined to definitively determine the validity of the 1988 agreement or forgery allegations at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of Munsiff, Muvattupuzha allowed the petition in part and granted a temporary prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from altering the present nature and position of the C schedule road as documented in commissioned reports. The court noted the dispute involves a claimed easement right through defendants' property, but declined to definitively determine the validity of the 1988 agreement or forgery allegations at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case