Baiju V.P vs Moly Paulose Advocate - Paul Mathew, Babitha T.H — 300159/2021

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER510002152021

For commission report

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

300230/2021

Filing Date

18-06-2021

Registration No

300159/2021

Registration Date

18-06-2021

Court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26
Ia/11/2025 Classification : Survey Commission Application Section Baiju V.PMoly Paulose
Ia/12/2025 Classification : Application to Accept Power of Attorney Section Baiju V.PMoly Paulose

Petitioner(s)

Baiju V.P

Adv. Biju Abraham, Biju Abraham, Sheen Kuriakose

Jino Varghese

Respondent(s)

Moly Paulose Advocate - Paul Mathew, Babitha T.H

Biju Paulose

Adv. Paul Mathew, Babitha T.H

Eli

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

07-03-2026

For commission report

23-01-2026

For commission report

11-12-2025

Call on

11-11-2025

Disposed

10-11-2025

Call on

Interim Orders

29-11-2022
Judgement

Summary The suit for fixation of boundary and injunction between two adjacent properties was dismissed by the Munsiff Court on 29 November 2022. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish his case because no survey commission report was provided to ascertain the exact boundaries between the two properties, making it impossible for the court to determine where the boundary should be fixed. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The suit for fixation of boundary and injunction between two adjacent properties was dismissed by the Munsiff Court on 29 November 2022. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish his case because no survey commission report was provided to ascertain the exact boundaries between the two properties, making it impossible for the court to determine where the boundary should be fixed. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case