Lathika vs Raju Advocate - B.Rajeevan — 300148/2017

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

Call on Next hearing 21-May-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER510002112017

Filing Number

300148/2017

Filing Date

18-Mar-2017

Registration No

300148/2017

Registration Date

18-Mar-2017

Court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lathika

    Adv. Gigi peter

  2. 2.Syamala

    Adv. Gigi peter

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju Advocate - B.Rajeevan

  2. 2.Shaju

    Adv. Ajay Mathew

Case History

  1. 21-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    For appearence of plaintiff/defendent

    Munsiff

  4. 15-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC

    Munsiff

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff

  6. 06-Oct-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff

  7. 10-Sep-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  9. 21-Jun-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  10. 08-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  11. 11-Mar-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  12. 31-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  13. 03-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  14. 11-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff

  15. 24-Sep-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff

  16. 31-Aug-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff

  17. 30-Jul-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff

  18. 29-Jun-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff

  19. 08-Apr-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff

  20. 29-Feb-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  21. 30-Jan-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  22. 08-Jan-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  23. 12-Dec-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff

  24. 22-Nov-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff

  25. 04-Nov-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff

  26. 26-Sep-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff

  27. 16-Aug-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff

  28. 13-Jul-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff

  29. 07-Jun-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff

  30. 23-Mar-2023

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  31. 20-Jan-2023

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  32. 14-Dec-2022

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The Court of Munsiff, Muvattupuzha decreed a partition suit filed by two daughters (plaintiffs) against their two brothers (defendants) regarding inherited property. The court found the will deed (Ext.B4) executed by their late father in favor of defendant no. 2 to be invalid due to suspicious circumstances, including the presence of the beneficiary at the scribe's office and the complete exclusion of the daughters despite being mentioned in the will's recitals. Consequently, the court ordered the disputed property to be divided equally into four shares, with each plaintiff and each defendant entitled to one-quarter share. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  33. 14-Dec-2022

    For Steps

    Munsiff

  34. 22-Nov-2022

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  35. 29-Oct-2022

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  36. 01-Oct-2022

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  37. 25-Aug-2022

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  38. 08-Aug-2022

    Further evidence

    Munsiff

  39. 27-Jul-2022

    Further evidence

    Munsiff

  40. 21-Jul-2022

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  41. 05-Jul-2022

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  42. 17-Jun-2022

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  43. 01-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  44. 29-Mar-2022

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  45. 08-Mar-2022

    Await report

    Munsiff

  46. 02-Mar-2022

    Await report

    Munsiff

  47. 08-Feb-2022

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  48. 02-Feb-2022

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  49. 25-Jan-2022

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  50. 11-Jan-2022

    For reports

    Munsiff

  51. 25-Nov-2021

    Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC

    Munsiff

  52. 23-Nov-2021

    Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC

    Munsiff

  53. 22-Oct-2021

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  54. 14-Sep-2021

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  55. 10-Aug-2021

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  56. 14-Jun-2021

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  57. 31-May-2021

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  58. 20-May-2021

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  59. 30-Mar-2021

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  60. 16-Mar-2021

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  61. 04-Feb-2021

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  62. 01-Jan-2021

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  63. 08-Jul-2020

    Trial in the list

    Munsiff

  64. 04-Jan-2020

    Trial in the list

    Munsiff

  65. 19-Sep-2019

    Not in the list

    Munsiff

  66. 31-May-2019

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  67. 11-Feb-2019

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  68. 15-Nov-2018

    Issues

    Munsiff

  69. 12-Sep-2018

    Issues

    Munsiff

  70. 12-Feb-2018

    Issues

    Munsiff

  71. 11-Feb-2018

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  72. 28-Nov-2017

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  73. 13-Nov-2017

    Call on

    Munsiff

  74. 23-Oct-2017

    Call on

    Munsiff

  75. 23-Sep-2017

    Call on

    Munsiff

  76. 21-Aug-2017

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  77. 20-Aug-2017

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  78. 06-Jun-2017

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  79. 18-Mar-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  80. 18-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300148/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of Munsiff, Muvattupuzha decreed a partition suit filed by two daughters (plaintiffs) against their two brothers (defendants) regarding inherited property. The court found the will deed (Ext.B4) executed by their late father in favor of defendant no. 2 to be invalid due to suspicious circumstances, including the presence of the beneficiary at the scribe's office and the complete exclusion of the daughters despite being mentioned in the will's recitals. Consequently, the court ordered the disputed property to be divided equally into four shares, with each plaintiff and each defendant entitled to one-quarter share. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case