Joy Abraham vs Raju Advocate - ADV. JIJO — 300081/2020

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Status: Report on mediation. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Report on mediation Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER510001402020

Filing Number

155/2020

Filing Date

07-Mar-2020

Registration No

300081/2020

Registration Date

07-Mar-2020

Court

Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Joy Abraham

    Adv. Gigi Peter

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju Advocate - ADV. JIJO

  2. 2.Mary@Mariyam

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  6. 21-Oct-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  7. 28-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  8. 20-May-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  9. 25-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  10. 22-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  11. 27-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  12. 30-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  13. 27-Jun-2024

    Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC

    Munsiff

  14. 30-May-2024

    Appearance Of Parties u/s 89 of CPC

    Munsiff

  15. 04-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  16. 22-Feb-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff

  17. 15-Jan-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff

  18. 01-Jan-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff

  19. 21-Oct-2023

    Restored

    Munsiff

  20. 21-Oct-2023

    For Admission

    Munsiff

  21. 21-Oct-2023

    For Steps

    Munsiff

  22. 25-Jul-2022

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The suit for injunction filed by Joy (plaintiff) against Raju and Mary (defendants) was allowed and decreed. The court restrained the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property, damaging its boundaries and improvements, and constructing any motorable road through it. The plaintiff was also awarded costs to be realized from the defendants and their assets. The judgment was delivered ex parte after the defendants failed to appear despite summons being issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 25-Jul-2022

    Disposed

    Munsiff

  24. 15-Jul-2022

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  25. 28-Jun-2022

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  26. 23-May-2022

    For Carry Out Amendment

    Munsiff

  27. 15-Feb-2022

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff

  28. 15-Nov-2021

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff

  29. 10-Sep-2021

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  30. 26-Jul-2021

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  31. 17-Jun-2021

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  32. 25-Mar-2021

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff

  33. 10-Mar-2021

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff

  34. 07-Jan-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff

  35. 07-Oct-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff

  36. 09-Jul-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff

  37. 09-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 07-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300081/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The suit for injunction filed by Joy (plaintiff) against Raju and Mary (defendants) was allowed and decreed. The court restrained the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property, damaging its boundaries and improvements, and constructing any motorable road through it. The plaintiff was also awarded costs to be realized from the defendants and their assets. The judgment was delivered ex parte after the defendants failed to appear despite summons being issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case