Kuttappan vs P K Krishnankutty Advocate - M Jayalal — 300123/2010
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section section26Order7Rule1. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER510000102010
Filing Number
300123/2010
Filing Date
19-Mar-2010
Registration No
300123/2010
Registration Date
19-Mar-2010
Court
Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-Munsiff
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kuttappan
Adv. Abraham Joseph
-
2.A K Prasad
Adv. Abraham Joseph
Respondent(s)
-
1.P K Krishnankutty Advocate - M Jayalal
-
2.Addl. D2 - Bhavani
Adv. Jayalal M,HAFSA K M
-
3.Addl D3 - Rajesh
Adv. Jayalal M,HAFSA K M
-
4.Addl. D4 - Suresh
Adv. Jayalal M,HAFSA K M
-
5.Addl. D5 - Ratheesh
Adv. Jayalal M,HAFSA K M
-
6.Addl. D6 - Remya
Adv. Jayalal M,HAFSA K M
-
7.Addl. D7 - Satheesh
Adv. Jayalal M,HAFSA K M
Case History
-
22-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
23-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
12-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
29-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
17-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
08-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
30-Oct-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
29-Sep-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
16-Sep-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
25-Aug-2025
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
22-Aug-2025
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
19-Aug-2025
Further evidence
Munsiff
-
02-Aug-2025
For return of summons
Munsiff
-
24-Jun-2025
Further evidence
Munsiff
-
22-May-2025
Further evidence
Munsiff
-
27-Mar-2025
Further evidence
Munsiff
-
05-Mar-2025
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
04-Feb-2025
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
23-Jan-2025
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
17-Jan-2025
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
18-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
25-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
29-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
10-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
05-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
14-Aug-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
23-Jul-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
22-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
11-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
15-Mar-2024
Return of notice
Munsiff
-
01-Mar-2024
For Steps
Munsiff
-
28-Feb-2024
For evidence
Munsiff
-
02-Feb-2024
Report on mediation
Munsiff
-
20-Jan-2024
Report on mediation
Munsiff
-
08-Jan-2024
Report on mediation
Munsiff
-
02-Dec-2023
Trial in the list
Munsiff
-
17-Oct-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
25-Aug-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
02-Aug-2023
Steps if any
Munsiff
-
14-Jul-2023
Steps if any
Munsiff
-
14-Jun-2023
Steps if any
Munsiff
-
01-Jun-2023
Steps if any
Munsiff
-
20-Mar-2023
Restored
Munsiff
-
20-Mar-2023
For Admission
Munsiff
-
20-Mar-2023
Steps if any
Munsiff
-
20-Aug-2019
JudgementView PDF
Summary: The suit for declaration of title, boundary fixation, and permanent prohibitory injunction was dismissed with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to prove valid legal title to the disputed 42-cent property, as both parties claimed rights through the same predecessor (Ayyappan) but via conflicting succession chains—the plaintiffs through their father Kunjan and the defendant through his mother Kochukutty. Since title was not established and no demarcating boundary existed, the court also rejected claims for boundary fixation and injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Aug-2019
Disposed
Munsiff
-
23-Jul-2019
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
04-Jul-2019
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
29-Jun-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
27-Jun-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
21-Jun-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
11-Jun-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
07-Jun-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
01-Jun-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
27-May-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
10-Apr-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
08-Apr-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
19-Mar-2019
Defence Evidence
Munsiff
-
14-Mar-2019
Defence Evidence
Munsiff
-
26-Feb-2019
Return of summons
Munsiff
-
20-Feb-2019
For commission report
Munsiff
-
11-Feb-2019
For commission report
Munsiff
-
22-Jan-2019
Restored
Munsiff
-
06-Jun-2018
JudgementView PDF
-
06-Jun-2018
Disposed
Munsiff
-
04-Jun-2018
Listed to
Munsiff
-
17-Feb-2018
Listed to
Munsiff
-
15-Jan-2018
Listed to
Munsiff
-
08-Dec-2017
Listed to
Munsiff
-
16-Oct-2017
Listed to
Munsiff
-
07-Aug-2017
Listed to
Munsiff
-
31-May-2017
Listed to
Munsiff
-
31-Mar-2017
For Steps
Munsiff
-
21-Feb-2017
For commission report
Munsiff
-
16-Jan-2017
For commission report
Munsiff
-
02-Dec-2016
For commission report
Munsiff
-
07-Oct-2016
For commission report
Munsiff
-
10-Aug-2016
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
12-Jul-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2010
Case filed
Registration No. 300123/2010
Summary: The suit for declaration of title, boundary fixation, and permanent prohibitory injunction was dismissed with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to prove valid legal title to the disputed 42-cent property, as both parties claimed rights through the same predecessor (Ayyappan) but via conflicting succession chains—the plaintiffs through their father Kunjan and the defendant through his mother Kochukutty. Since title was not established and no demarcating boundary existed, the court also rejected claims for boundary fixation and injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts