Shihab vs Sainaba Advocate - Jain C — 200056/2022

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26O7R1. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER500002082022

FOR HEARING

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200238/2022

Filing Date

17-08-2022

Registration No

200056/2022

Registration Date

17-08-2022

Court

Sub Court , Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-SUB JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26O7R1
IA/6/2025 Classification : Petition Section SainabaShihab

Petitioner(s)

Shihab

Adv. Gigi Peter

Hana Fathima

Hiza Shihab

Respondent(s)

Sainaba Advocate - Jain C

Benazir

Adv. Prasad M. Baby, Athira Haridas

Yoosaf

Adv. Prasad M. Baby, Athira Haridas

Pathumma

Adv. Prasad M. Baby, Athira Haridas

Beevi

Adv. Prasad M. Baby, Athira Haridas

Hearing History

Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE

06-04-2026

FOR HEARING

27-03-2026

FOR HEARING

18-03-2026

FOR HEARING

16-03-2026

FOR HEARING

09-03-2026

FOR HEARING

Interim Orders

26-05-2023
Order
26-05-2023
Order
17-08-2022
Order
17-08-2022
Order

Summary: The Court of the Sub Judge, Muvattupuzha granted an ad-interim prohibitory injunction restraining the respondents from transferring or encumbering the plaint schedule property without disclosing the plaintiffs' claim in the suit. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case with balance of convenience in their favor, and that irreparable injury would result if the injunction were not granted. The respondents were directed to be served urgent notice, with return of notice fixed for 02.09.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of the Sub Judge, Muvattupuzha granted an ad-interim prohibitory injunction restraining the respondents from transferring or encumbering the plaint schedule property without disclosing the plaintiffs' claim in the suit. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case with balance of convenience in their favor, and that irreparable injury would result if the injunction were not granted. The respondents were directed to be served urgent notice, with return of notice fixed for 02.09.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court , Muvattupuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case