Binu Mon vs Tomy George Advocate - Paul Mathew — 200028/2018
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section O VII R 1. Status: Stay report. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER500001832018
Filing Number
200028/2018
Filing Date
07-Sep-2018
Registration No
200028/2018
Registration Date
07-Sep-2018
Court
Sub Court , Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Binu Mon
Adv. G Suresh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tomy George Advocate - Paul Mathew
-
2.Lissy
Adv. Paul Mathew
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Stay report
Sub Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Stay report
Sub Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Stayed by High Court
Sub Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Stayed. Call on
Sub Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Stay report
Sub Judge
-
27-Sep-2025
Stayed by High Court
Sub Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Call on
Sub Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Order/ Judgement
Sub Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Listed to
Sub Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Disposed
Sub Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Call on
Sub Judge
-
11-Jan-2024
JudgementView PDF
Summary: In O.S. No. 28/2018 before the Sub Judge, Muvattupuzha, the suit filed by Binu Mon against Tomy George and Lissy for recovery of money and permanent prohibitory injunction was dismissed for default on January 11, 2024. The court found that despite several postings granted for the plaintiff's evidence, no application for adjournment was filed, leading to the dismissal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jan-2024
—
Sub Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Listed to
Sub Judge
-
20-Jul-2023
Listed to
Sub Judge
-
11-Jul-2023
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
23-Jun-2023
for evidence.
Sub Judge
-
09-Jun-2023
for evidence.
Sub Judge
-
25-May-2023
for evidence.
Sub Judge
-
22-May-2023
Listed to
Sub Judge
-
01-Mar-2023
Listed to
Sub Judge
-
01-Feb-2023
For reports
Sub Judge
-
18-Jan-2023
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
18-Nov-2022
For commission report
Sub Judge
-
04-Nov-2022
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
21-Oct-2022
Petitioner prays
Sub Judge
-
03-Sep-2022
For commission report
Sub Judge
-
02-Sep-2022
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
26-Aug-2022
Orders in IA
Sub Judge
-
24-Aug-2022
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
10-Aug-2022
For commission report
Sub Judge
-
08-Jul-2022
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
08-Jun-2022
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
27-May-2022
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
06-Apr-2022
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
26-Mar-2022
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
24-Mar-2022
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
15-Mar-2022
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
08-Mar-2022
For further hearing
Sub Judge
-
03-Mar-2022
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
26-Feb-2022
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
25-Feb-2022
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
24-Feb-2022
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
23-Feb-2022
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
20-Nov-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
06-Nov-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
01-Oct-2021
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
25-Sep-2021
for evidence.
Sub Judge
-
23-Sep-2021
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
27-Aug-2021
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
06-Aug-2021
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
06-Jul-2021
For Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
22-Mar-2021
Call with IA
Sub Judge
-
16-Mar-2021
Call with IA
Sub Judge
-
08-Jan-2021
Call with IA
Sub Judge
-
07-Jan-2021
Call on
Sub Judge
-
17-Dec-2020
Call on
Sub Judge
-
30-Nov-2020
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
09-Oct-2020
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
26-Aug-2020
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
11-Aug-2020
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
07-Jul-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
11-Mar-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
15-Jan-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
18-Nov-2019
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
16-Jul-2019
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
11-Jul-2019
Call with IA
Sub Judge
-
11-Apr-2019
Call with IA
Sub Judge
-
26-Feb-2019
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
21-Dec-2018
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
16-Oct-2018
Attachment of scheduled properties
Sub Judge
-
05-Oct-2018
Attachment of scheduled properties
Sub Judge
-
07-Sep-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 200028/2018
Summary: In O.S. No. 28/2018 before the Sub Judge, Muvattupuzha, the suit filed by Binu Mon against Tomy George and Lissy for recovery of money and permanent prohibitory injunction was dismissed for default on January 11, 2024. The court found that despite several postings granted for the plaintiff's evidence, no application for adjournment was filed, leading to the dismissal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts