Shajahan vs Shani Makkar Advocate - G Suresh — 200021/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 1. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER500001042024
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2024
Filing Number
200111/2024
Filing Date
02-03-2024
Registration No
200021/2024
Registration Date
02-03-2024
Court
Sub Court , Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shajahan
Adv. JIJO JOSEPH
Respondent(s)
Shani Makkar Advocate - G Suresh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
FOR HEARING
For hearing on IA
For hearing on IA
For Objection and hearing
Orders in IA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 19-03-2026 | For hearing on IA | |
| 09-03-2026 | For hearing on IA | |
| 24-02-2026 | For Objection and hearing | |
| 23-02-2026 | Orders in IA |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed The Sub Judge of Muvattupuzha dismissed the plaintiff's application for conditional attachment of the defendant's property on March 19, 2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for the claimed ₹30 lakh loan, citing inconsistencies in the plaintiff's statements, violation of Income Tax Act Section 269 ST (prohibiting cash transactions exceeding ₹2 lakh), and witnesses denying knowledge of the promissory note's execution. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed The Sub Judge of Muvattupuzha dismissed the plaintiff's application for conditional attachment of the defendant's property on March 19, 2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for the claimed ₹30 lakh loan, citing inconsistencies in the plaintiff's statements, violation of Income Tax Act Section 269 ST (prohibiting cash transactions exceeding ₹2 lakh), and witnesses denying knowledge of the promissory note's execution. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts