Shajahan vs Shani Makkar Advocate - G Suresh — 200021/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 1. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER500001042024
e-Filing Number
02-03-2024
Filing Number
200111/2024
Filing Date
02-Mar-2024
Registration No
200021/2024
Registration Date
02-Mar-2024
Court
Sub Court , Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shajahan
Adv. JIJO JOSEPH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shani Makkar Advocate - G Suresh
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Order
-
24-Feb-2026
For Objection and hearing
Sub Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Orders in IA
Sub Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Orders in IA
Sub Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Orders in IA
Sub Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
For Objection and hearing
Sub Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
For Objection and hearing
Sub Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
For affidavit.
Sub Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
No sitting notified
Sub Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Call on
Sub Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Verify and report
Sub Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
Call on
Sub Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
For Objection and hearing
Sub Judge
-
17-Mar-2025
Issues
Sub Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Issues
Sub Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
01-Nov-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
31-Aug-2024
Call on
Sub Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Call on
Sub Judge
-
18-Jun-2024
Call on
Sub Judge
-
19-Mar-2024
OrderView PDF
-
19-Mar-2024
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed The Sub Judge of Muvattupuzha dismissed the plaintiff's application for conditional attachment of the defendant's property on March 19, 2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for the claimed ₹30 lakh loan, citing inconsistencies in the plaintiff's statements, violation of Income Tax Act Section 269 ST (prohibiting cash transactions exceeding ₹2 lakh), and witnesses denying knowledge of the promissory note's execution. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2024
Orders in IA
Sub Judge
-
18-Mar-2024
Orders in IA
Sub Judge
-
14-Mar-2024
Orders in IA
Sub Judge
-
07-Mar-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
For hearing on IA
Sub Judge
-
02-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 200021/2024
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed The Sub Judge of Muvattupuzha dismissed the plaintiff's application for conditional attachment of the defendant's property on March 19, 2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for the claimed ₹30 lakh loan, citing inconsistencies in the plaintiff's statements, violation of Income Tax Act Section 269 ST (prohibiting cash transactions exceeding ₹2 lakh), and witnesses denying knowledge of the promissory note's execution. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts