Mathew Thomas vs M. A Antony Advocate - JAYAPRAKASH A K, SARITHA S — 200026/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section US96,RO41,R1. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
AS - CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: KLER500000912023
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200129/2023
Filing Date
20-03-2023
Registration No
200026/2023
Registration Date
20-03-2023
Court
Sub Court , Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mathew Thomas
Adv. Gigi Peter
Respondent(s)
M. A Antony Advocate - JAYAPRAKASH A K, SARITHA S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 20-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 04-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1963 and Section 151 CPC 1908 to condone a 26-day delay in filing the suit was allowed. The court condoned the delay based on reasons stated in the affidavit, subject to the appellant/defendant Mathew Thomas paying cost of Rs. 500/- to the respondent who filed objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1963 and Section 151 CPC 1908 to condone a 26-day delay in filing the suit was allowed. The court condoned the delay based on reasons stated in the affidavit, subject to the appellant/defendant Mathew Thomas paying cost of Rs. 500/- to the respondent who filed objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts