The Vadattupara Rural Cooperative Society Ltd. vs Aliyas P. E Advocate - Sherman A. Geroge — 200016/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S76. Status: For production of documents/Affidavit. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLER500000892023
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200121/2023
Filing Date
15-03-2023
Registration No
200016/2023
Registration Date
15-03-2023
Court
Sub Court , Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Vadattupara Rural Cooperative Society Ltd.
Adv. George Mathew, K. T Mathew, Jain Varghese, Stephy K. Regi
Respondent(s)
Aliyas P. E Advocate - Sherman A. Geroge
Joy Kuriakose
Adv. Sherman A. Geroge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
Call on
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 09-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 09-02-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 27-01-2026 | Call on | |
| 14-01-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition filed by judgment debtors under Section 151 CPC was allowed. The court directed the decree-holder bank to produce the valuation report prepared at the time of granting the loan and ordered that the execution proceeding be posted for independent inquiry into the market value of the property, citing a wide disparity between the upset price of ₹12,85,000 proposed by the bank and the judgment debtors' claim that the property is worth significantly more. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition filed by judgment debtors under Section 151 CPC was allowed. The court directed the decree-holder bank to produce the valuation report prepared at the time of granting the loan and ordered that the execution proceeding be posted for independent inquiry into the market value of the property, citing a wide disparity between the upset price of ₹12,85,000 proposed by the bank and the judgment debtors' claim that the property is worth significantly more. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts