The Vadattupara Rural Coperative Society Ltd vs Sarojini K. A Advocate - Sherman A. Geroge — 200015/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26. Status: For production of documents/Affidavit. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLER500000882023
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200120/2023
Filing Date
15-03-2023
Registration No
200015/2023
Registration Date
15-03-2023
Court
Sub Court , Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Vadattupara Rural Coperative Society Ltd
Adv. George Mathew, K. T Mathew, Jain Varghese, Stephy K. Regi
Respondent(s)
Sarojini K. A Advocate - Sherman A. Geroge
Ritty Joy
Adv. Sherman A. Geroge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
With connected case
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 09-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 09-02-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 27-01-2026 | With connected case | |
| 14-01-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtors under Section 151 CPC seeking production of the bank's valuation report for property proposed to be auctioned was allowed. The court directed the decree-holder (Vadattuppara Rural Co-operative Society) to produce the valuation report prepared at the time of granting the loan, and posted the execution proceeding for inquiry into the market value of the property, citing wide disparity between the upset price (₹10,50,000) and claimed actual value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtors under Section 151 CPC seeking production of the bank's valuation report for property proposed to be auctioned was allowed. The court directed the decree-holder (Vadattuppara Rural Co-operative Society) to produce the valuation report prepared at the time of granting the loan, and posted the execution proceeding for inquiry into the market value of the property, citing wide disparity between the upset price (₹10,50,000) and claimed actual value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts