Vadattupara Rural Co opertive Society Ltd. vs Ritty Joy Advocate - Sherman A. George — 200014/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S151. Status: For production of documents/Affidavit. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLER500000872023
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200119/2023
Filing Date
15-03-2023
Registration No
200014/2023
Registration Date
15-03-2023
Court
Sub Court , Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vadattupara Rural Co opertive Society Ltd.
Adv. George Mathew, K. T Mathew, Jain Varghese, Stephy K. Regi
Respondent(s)
Ritty Joy Advocate - Sherman A. George
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 09-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 09-02-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 27-01-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 14-01-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Petition Allowed The Civil Judge of Muvattupuzha allowed the petition filed by judgment debtor Ritty Joy under Section 151 CPC. The court directed the decree holder (Vadattuppara Rural Co-operative Society) to produce the valuation report prepared at the time of granting the loan regarding the 7.69 acres property proposed for auction with an upset price of ₹10,50,000. The court found that due to wide disparity between the decree holder's valuation (₹39,600/- per are) and the debtor's claim, an independent enquiry on the property's market value is necessary before proceeding with the sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Petition Allowed The Civil Judge of Muvattupuzha allowed the petition filed by judgment debtor Ritty Joy under Section 151 CPC. The court directed the decree holder (Vadattuppara Rural Co-operative Society) to produce the valuation report prepared at the time of granting the loan regarding the 7.69 acres property proposed for auction with an upset price of ₹10,50,000. The court found that due to wide disparity between the decree holder's valuation (₹39,600/- per are) and the debtor's claim, an independent enquiry on the property's market value is necessary before proceeding with the sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts