The Vadattupara Rural Co operative Society Ltd. vs Joy Kuriakose Advocate - Sherman A. Geroge — 200013/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S76. Status: For production of documents/Affidavit. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLER500000862023
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200118/2023
Filing Date
15-03-2023
Registration No
200013/2023
Registration Date
15-03-2023
Court
Sub Court , Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Vadattupara Rural Co operative Society Ltd.
Adv. George Mathew, K. T Mathew, Jain Varghese, Stephy K. Regi
Respondent(s)
Joy Kuriakose Advocate - Sherman A. Geroge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 09-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 09-02-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 27-01-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 14-01-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtor Joy Kuriakose under Section 151 CPC was allowed. The court directed the decree holder (Vadattuppara Rural Co-operative Society) to produce the valuation report prepared at the time of granting the loan and ordered the execution proceedings to be posted for inquiry into the market value of the property. The court found that due to wide disparity between the upset price (₹10,50,000) and claimed actual value, an independent valuation was necessary to enable prospective purchasers to fairly assess the property being sold at auction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtor Joy Kuriakose under Section 151 CPC was allowed. The court directed the decree holder (Vadattuppara Rural Co-operative Society) to produce the valuation report prepared at the time of granting the loan and ordered the execution proceedings to be posted for inquiry into the market value of the property. The court found that due to wide disparity between the upset price (₹10,50,000) and claimed actual value, an independent valuation was necessary to enable prospective purchasers to fairly assess the property being sold at auction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts