Abdulkhader vs Nabeesa Advocate - Antony Shyju, H. Nujumudeen, Sherin Achu Ninan — 200023/2022
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section O7R1. Status: Stay report. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER500000652022
Next Hearing
23rd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
96/2022
Filing Date
26-03-2022
Registration No
200023/2022
Registration Date
26-03-2022
Court
Sub Court , Muvattupuzha
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdulkhader
Adv. Jijo Joseph, Rahim P M
Ameer T A
Fathima Abdulkhader
Respondent(s)
Nabeesa Advocate - Antony Shyju, H. Nujumudeen, Sherin Achu Ninan
Roobiya
Adv. Antony Shyju, H. Nujumudeen, Sherin Achu Ninan
Suhara Salim
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
Stay report
Call on
Stay report
Stayed. Call on
Stayed. Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Stay report | |
| 10-03-2026 | Call on | |
| 10-02-2026 | Stay report | |
| 24-01-2026 | Stayed. Call on | |
| 19-01-2026 | Stayed. Call on |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition filed by additional plaintiffs Ameer T.A. and Fathima Abdulkhader to amend the plaint was allowed by the Civil Judge. The court permitted correction of an incorrectly cited court fee provision—changing Section 31(2) to the correct Section 37(2) of the Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act—finding that the error was a clerical mistake made despite due diligence and that allowing the amendment would not prejudice the defendants or alter the suit's fundamental nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition filed by additional plaintiffs Ameer T.A. and Fathima Abdulkhader to amend the plaint was allowed by the Civil Judge. The court permitted correction of an incorrectly cited court fee provision—changing Section 31(2) to the correct Section 37(2) of the Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act—finding that the error was a clerical mistake made despite due diligence and that allowing the amendment would not prejudice the defendants or alter the suit's fundamental nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts