K.M. Dineshan vs T.M. Shamsudeen — 100761/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Issue Summons. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

OP(MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)

CNR: KLER490007882022

Issue Summons

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

24-09-2022

Filing Number

785/2022

Filing Date

24-09-2022

Registration No

100761/2022

Registration Date

24-09-2022

Court

MACT, Muvattupuzha

Judge

1-MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 166
IA/4/2025 Classification : Section K.M. Dineshan
IA/1/2026 Classification : Application For Admission Of Documents Section K.M. DineshanManager, The New India Assurance Co.ltd.
IA/2/2026 Classification : Application To Issue Summons Section K.M. DineshanManager, The New India Assurance Co.ltd.

Petitioner(s)

K.M. Dineshan

Adv. THOMAS JOHN, THOMAS JOHN

Respondent(s)

T.M. Shamsudeen

Manager, The New India Assurance Co.ltd.

Adv. Shayisha.S.S.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL

30-03-2026

Issue Summons

25-03-2026

Defendant/Respondent Evidence

19-03-2026

Further evidence

09-03-2026

for evidence.

21-11-2025

Listed to

Interim Orders

21-02-2024
Order

Case Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dismissed the original petition (OP(MV)761/2022) on 21st February 2024 as the petitioner K.M. Dineshan failed to appear for the hearing scheduled for petitioner's evidence. The petitioner's counsel filed a memo stating "no instruction" from the client, and the tribunal consequently marked the petitioner absent and dismissed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dismissed the original petition (OP(MV)761/2022) on 21st February 2024 as the petitioner K.M. Dineshan failed to appear for the hearing scheduled for petitioner's evidence. The petitioner's counsel filed a memo stating "no instruction" from the client, and the tribunal consequently marked the petitioner absent and dismissed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

MACT, Muvattupuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case