Aji Mathew vs P.C.Saiju — 100222/2021

Case under Cr. P.c. \ Section S 374(3). Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KLER480001142021

FOR HEARING

Next Hearing

12th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

86/2021

Filing Date

21-10-2021

Registration No

100222/2021

Registration Date

09-11-2021

Court

Addl. District Court, Muvattupuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

1-Addl. District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

Cr. P.C. \ Section S 374(3)

Petitioner(s)

Aji Mathew

Adv. Adv.Riji.P.

Respondent(s)

P.C.Saiju

The State Rep. by Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl. District and Sessions Judge

01-04-2026

FOR HEARING

09-03-2026

FOR HEARING

24-02-2026

FOR HEARING

06-02-2026

FOR HEARING

27-01-2026

FOR HEARING

Interim Orders

13-11-2023
Judgement
13-11-2023
Judgement

SUMMARY: The appeal filed by three respondents (husband and his parents) challenging a lower court's domestic violence protection order and interim maintenance direction was dismissed. The Additional District and Sessions Judge upheld the Gram Nyayalaya's ex-parte order under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, which restrained the respondents from committing physical cruelty and directed the husband to pay ₹3,000 monthly maintenance to his wife. The court found the petitioner's allegations of domestic violence, dowry demands, and infidelity accusations prima facie credible, and determined the interim maintenance was reasonable given her lack of income and the husband's financial capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The appeal filed by three respondents (husband and his parents) challenging a lower court's domestic violence protection order and interim maintenance direction was dismissed. The Additional District and Sessions Judge upheld the Gram Nyayalaya's ex-parte order under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, which restrained the respondents from committing physical cruelty and directed the husband to pay ₹3,000 monthly maintenance to his wife. The court found the petitioner's allegations of domestic violence, dowry demands, and infidelity accusations prima facie credible, and determined the interim maintenance was reasonable given her lack of income and the husband's financial capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Addl. District Court, Muvattupuzha/Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case