K K MATHUKUNJU vs SAFEER — 403953/2016

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.

For Hearing Next hearing 28-Mar-2026 this date has passed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLER430030022016

Filing Number

403953/2016

Filing Date

02-Mar-2016

Registration No

403953/2016

Registration Date

02-Mar-2016

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court1, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Judicial first class magistrate-1

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K K MATHUKUNJU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAFEER

Case History

  1. 28-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  5. 24-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  6. 14-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  10. 05-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  11. 06-Oct-2025

    For objecting and hearing Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  12. 23-Sep-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  13. 18-Aug-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  14. 05-Aug-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  15. 08-Jul-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  16. 10-Jun-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  17. 05-Jun-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  18. 08-May-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  19. 21-Apr-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  20. 15-Apr-2025

    Further evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  21. 12-Mar-2025

    Further evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  22. 22-Feb-2025

    For cross examination.

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  23. 13-Feb-2025

    For cross examination.

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  24. 26-Dec-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  25. 29-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  26. 12-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  27. 19-Oct-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  28. 19-Sep-2024

    Stay report

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  29. 01-Aug-2024

    Stay report

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  30. 11-Jun-2024

    Stayed by High Court

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  31. 06-Apr-2024

    Stayed by High Court

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  32. 19-Mar-2024

    Verify and report

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  33. 30-Dec-2023

    Stayed by High Court

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  34. 18-Oct-2023

    Stayed by High Court

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  35. 18-Aug-2023

    Stayed by High Court

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  36. 27-Jul-2023

    Stayed by High Court

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  37. 24-Jun-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  38. 27-May-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  39. 17-Apr-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  40. 04-Mar-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  41. 28-Jan-2023

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The accused's petition to recall PW1 (complainant) for cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC was dismissed as an abuse of process. The court found that the accused's counsel failed to appear on the scheduled date (15.12.2022) due to personal inconvenience, despite the complainant and court waiting until 3:20 PM, and that the accused had already been granted an earlier petition for the same purpose. The court rejected the petition as dilatory tactics in an ongoing Negotiable Instruments Act case filed in 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  42. 28-Jan-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  43. 24-Jan-2023

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  44. 19-Jan-2023

    Objection

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  45. 12-Jan-2023

    Objection

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  46. 15-Dec-2022

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  47. 19-Nov-2022

    For Examination of Witness

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  48. 18-Oct-2022

    For Examination of Witness

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  49. 24-Sep-2022

    For Examination of Witness

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  50. 20-Aug-2022

    For Examination of Witness

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  51. 11-Aug-2022

    For Hearing

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  52. 03-May-2022

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  53. 11-Apr-2022

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  54. 02-Apr-2022

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  55. 21-Feb-2022

    for evidence.

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  56. 05-Feb-2022

    for evidence.

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  57. 21-Dec-2021

    for evidence.

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  58. 03-Dec-2021

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  59. 11-Aug-2021

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  60. 03-May-2021

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  61. 16-Dec-2020

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  62. 30-Jun-2020

    No sitting notified

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  63. 22-Feb-2020

    No sitting notified

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  64. 21-Feb-2020

    For appearence of Complainant

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  65. 26-Oct-2019

    For appearence of Complainant

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  66. 17-Aug-2019

    For appearence of Complainant

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  67. 06-Jun-2019

    For evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  68. 05-Jun-2019

    For evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  69. 19-Feb-2019

    For evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  70. 09-Nov-2018

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  71. 17-Apr-2018

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  72. 21-Oct-2017

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  73. 02-Jun-2017

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  74. 17-Jan-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  75. 02-Mar-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 403953/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The accused's petition to recall PW1 (complainant) for cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC was dismissed as an abuse of process. The court found that the accused's counsel failed to appear on the scheduled date (15.12.2022) due to personal inconvenience, despite the complainant and court waiting until 3:20 PM, and that the accused had already been granted an earlier petition for the same purpose. The court rejected the petition as dilatory tactics in an ongoing Negotiable Instruments Act case filed in 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case