josphin vs Dhanesh — 400041/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: For cross examination.. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLER430011502023

For cross examination.

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1147/2023

Filing Date

29-07-2023

Registration No

400041/2023

Registration Date

29-07-2023

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court1, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Judicial first class magistrate-1

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12
Crl.MP/2882/2023 Classification : Direction Petition Section Dhanesh
Crl.MP/4025/2025 Classification : Direction Petition Section josphinDhanesh
Crl.MP/4529/2025 Classification : Urgent Application Section Dhaneshjosphin
Crl.MP/4776/2025 Classification : Petition Section josphinDhanesh

Petitioner(s)

josphin

Adv. Remya Velayudhan

Shan Dhanesh

Respondent(s)

Dhanesh

Ammini Thambi

Nisha Sajeevan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial first class magistrate-1

07-04-2026

For cross examination.

09-03-2026

For cross examination.

05-03-2026

For cross examination.

26-02-2026

For evidence

17-02-2026

Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

Interim Orders

01-12-2025
Order
01-12-2025
Order

Summary: The petition filed by Dhanesh (husband) seeking to shift his child from Vimala Central School to a government or aided school citing financial constraints was dismissed. The court found no change in the petitioner's financial status since the child's original admission and held that child welfare must be the primary criterion in parental disputes, ruling that shifting schools would not serve the child's better interests at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Dhanesh (husband) seeking to shift his child from Vimala Central School to a government or aided school citing financial constraints was dismissed. The court found no change in the petitioner's financial status since the child's original admission and held that child welfare must be the primary criterion in parental disputes, ruling that shifting schools would not serve the child's better interests at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court1, Perumbavoor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case