josphin vs Dhanesh — 400041/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: For cross examination.. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

For cross examination. Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLER430011502023

Filing Number

1147/2023

Filing Date

29-Jul-2023

Registration No

400041/2023

Registration Date

29-Jul-2023

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court1, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Judicial first class magistrate-1

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.josphin

    Adv. Remya Velayudhan

  2. 2.Shan Dhanesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dhanesh

  2. 2.Ammini Thambi

  3. 3.Nisha Sajeevan

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    For cross examination.

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    For cross examination.

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    For cross examination.

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    For evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    For evidence

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by Dhanesh (husband) seeking to shift his child from Vimala Central School to a government or aided school citing financial constraints was dismissed. The court found no change in the petitioner's financial status since the child's original admission and held that child welfare must be the primary criterion in parental disputes, ruling that shifting schools would not serve the child's better interests at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  13. 28-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  14. 26-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  15. 18-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  16. 31-Oct-2025

    For objecting and hearing Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  17. 01-Sep-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  18. 20-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  19. 18-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  20. 11-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  21. 24-May-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  22. 22-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  23. 15-Mar-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  24. 31-Jan-2025

    Stayed by High Court

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  25. 25-Jan-2025

    Stayed by High Court

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  26. 15-Jan-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  27. 14-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  28. 09-Jan-2025

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  29. 06-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  30. 03-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  31. 01-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  32. 20-Dec-2024

    For objecting and hearing Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  33. 18-Dec-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  34. 16-Dec-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  35. 05-Dec-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  36. 26-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  37. 13-Nov-2024

    For Enquiry

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  38. 06-Nov-2024

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  39. 26-Oct-2024

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  40. 04-Sep-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  41. 13-Aug-2024

    For objecting and hearing Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  42. 12-Aug-2024

    For objecting and hearing Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  43. 07-Aug-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  44. 30-Jul-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  45. 25-Jul-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  46. 24-Jul-2024

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  47. 18-Jul-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  48. 10-Jul-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  49. 09-Jul-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  50. 25-Jun-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  51. 22-Jun-2024

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  52. 22-May-2024

    For objecting and hearing Cmp

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  53. 04-May-2024

    For reports

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  54. 09-Apr-2024

    For reports

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  55. 06-Apr-2024

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  56. 02-Mar-2024

    Adjourned

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  57. 24-Feb-2024

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  58. 20-Jan-2024

    For Steps

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  59. 02-Dec-2023

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  60. 18-Nov-2023

    Call on

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  61. 07-Oct-2023

    Objection

    Judicial first class magistrate-1

  62. 26-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 29-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 400041/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Dhanesh (husband) seeking to shift his child from Vimala Central School to a government or aided school citing financial constraints was dismissed. The court found no change in the petitioner's financial status since the child's original admission and held that child welfare must be the primary criterion in parental disputes, ruling that shifting schools would not serve the child's better interests at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case