Devan Narayanan vs Nss Karayogam, No 1669 Advocate - M Rajendran — 300386/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section section26,order7rule1. Status: Report on mediation. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER420008792023
e-Filing Number
15-12-2023
Filing Number
300989/2023
Filing Date
15-Dec-2023
Registration No
300386/2023
Registration Date
15-Dec-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Judge
1-Munsiff Perumbavoor
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Devan Narayanan
Adv. MURALEEDHARAN K C
-
2.Jayakrishnan
Adv. MURALEEDHARAN K C
-
3.Padmanabhan Kp
Adv. MURALEEDHARAN K C
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nss Karayogam, No 1669 Advocate - M Rajendran
Case History
-
30-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Report on mediation
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
29-Jan-2026
Issues
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
03-Dec-2025
Issues
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
22-Oct-2025
Issues
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
09-Sep-2025
Issues
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
19-Jul-2025
Call on
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
04-Apr-2025
Issues
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
10-Dec-2024
Issues
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
21-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
13-Jun-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary: The petition under Order 1 Rule 8 of CPC seeking paper publication for a suit concerning cancellation of a property document (Document No. 1943/75) relating to temple property has been dismissed. The court found that temple devotees and other illam members are not necessary parties to the suit since their rights are not adversely affected by the relief sought, and effective adjudication is possible without them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jun-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
05-Jun-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
20-May-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
26-Feb-2024
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
23-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
17-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
15-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 300386/2023
Summary: The petition under Order 1 Rule 8 of CPC seeking paper publication for a suit concerning cancellation of a property document (Document No. 1943/75) relating to temple property has been dismissed. The court found that temple devotees and other illam members are not necessary parties to the suit since their rights are not adversely affected by the relief sought, and effective adjudication is possible without them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts