K M John vs Lissy — 300011/2023

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 11(2)(b),11(3)and11(4)(iv). Status: For hearing on IA. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION

CNR: KLER420006332023

For hearing on IA

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

04-08-2023

Filing Number

300703/2023

Filing Date

04-08-2023

Registration No

300011/2023

Registration Date

08-08-2023

Court

Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Munsiff Perumbavoor

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 11(2)(b),11(3)and11(4)(iv)
IA/2/2025 Classification : Delay Condonation Application Section LissyK M John
IA(Restoration)/25/2025 Classification : Petition To Set Aside Order / Decree Section LissyK M John
IA/1/2026 Classification : Direction Petition Section K M JohnLissy

Petitioner(s)

K M John

Adv. RAMESH CHAND, RAMESH CHAND

Respondent(s)

Lissy

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff Perumbavoor

01-04-2026

For hearing on IA

21-03-2026

FOR HEARING

10-03-2026

FOR HEARING

03-03-2026

For Objection and hearing

29-01-2026

for evidence.

Interim Orders

31-10-2023
Order

Summary: The Rent Controller's petition is allowed. The respondent (tenant) is directed to surrender vacant possession of the building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act if rent arrears of Rs. 67,000 are paid within one month; otherwise, possession must be surrendered under Section 11(3) of the same Act. The respondent failed to appear and contest, and the petitioner's unchallenged evidence established the valid lease deed and non-payment of rent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Rent Controller's petition is allowed. The respondent (tenant) is directed to surrender vacant possession of the building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act if rent arrears of Rs. 67,000 are paid within one month; otherwise, possession must be surrendered under Section 11(3) of the same Act. The respondent failed to appear and contest, and the petitioner's unchallenged evidence established the valid lease deed and non-payment of rent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case