Thomas vs Biju Thomas — 300337/2024

Summary: The court allowed I.A. 2/2024 in part and allowed I.A. 6/2025 in a property dispute regarding right of way. The defendants are restrained from obstructing the plaintiffs' use of the C-schedule pathway, while the plaintiffs are restrained from obstructing the defendants' use of the B-schedule pathway. The court found that while plaint B-schedule lacks clear demarcation, it can serve as access to the defendants' property, giving defendants priority over that route; conversely, plaint C-schedule is the only viable access for plaintiffs. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.