Reji Thomas vs Aleyamma Thambi — 300314/2021

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section O7R1. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

For commission report Next hearing 16-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER420004892021

Filing Number

300578/2021

Filing Date

01-Dec-2021

Registration No

300314/2021

Registration Date

01-Dec-2021

Court

Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Munsiff Perumbavoor

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Reji Thomas

    Adv. Adv.Hazeem Khan

  2. 2.Blesson

    Adv. Haseem Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aleyamma Thambi

  2. 2.Anoop Thambi

  3. 3.Sneha Anoop

  4. 4.George

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue notice

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  5. 06-Oct-2025

    Issue notice

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  6. 21-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  7. 06-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  8. 01-Feb-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  9. 10-Dec-2024

    For commission report

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  10. 01-Nov-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The petition for interim prohibitory injunction was allowed. The court restrained the respondents from obstructing transportation through the disputed "C schedule" way, which provides access to the petitioners' properties, until disposal of the main suit. The court found the petitioners had established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and irreparable injury would result from denial of the injunction, particularly since no alternative access to their property existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 01-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  12. 30-Oct-2024

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  13. 29-Oct-2024

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  14. 24-Oct-2024

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  15. 17-Oct-2024

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  16. 03-Oct-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  17. 30-Sep-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  18. 25-Sep-2024

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  19. 11-Sep-2024

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  20. 06-Sep-2024

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  21. 23-Aug-2024

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  22. 22-Aug-2024

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  23. 19-Aug-2024

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  24. 12-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  25. 21-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  26. 09-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  27. 17-Aug-2023

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  28. 11-Apr-2023

    For Replication

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  29. 05-Jan-2023

    For Replication

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  30. 07-Nov-2022

    For Replication

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  31. 25-Aug-2022

    For Replication

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  32. 01-Jul-2022

    For Replication

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  33. 07-Apr-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  34. 29-Jan-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  35. 01-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 01-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300314/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition for interim prohibitory injunction was allowed. The court restrained the respondents from obstructing transportation through the disputed "C schedule" way, which provides access to the petitioners' properties, until disposal of the main suit. The court found the petitioners had established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and irreparable injury would result from denial of the injunction, particularly since no alternative access to their property existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case