K G Eldhose vs Pavithran M R — 300272/2018
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26,O7,R1. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER420003832018
Filing Number
300445/2018
Filing Date
28-Sep-2018
Registration No
300272/2018
Registration Date
29-Sep-2018
Court
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Judge
1-Munsiff Perumbavoor
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K G Eldhose
Adv. M B Sandeep
-
2.Ammini Eldhose
Adv. M B Sandeep
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pavithran M R
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Listed to
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
16-Feb-2026
For Steps
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
02-Feb-2026
For Steps
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
09-Jan-2026
For Steps
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
11-Dec-2025
For Depositting Batta
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
24-Nov-2025
For Depositting Batta
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
23-Oct-2025
For Depositting Batta
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
16-Oct-2025
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
03-Oct-2025
For Steps
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
26-Aug-2025
Call on
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
26-Jul-2025
Bcf and steps
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
30-Jun-2025
Call on
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
23-May-2025
Call on
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
20-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
05-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
09-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
09-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor allowed the amendment petition filed by the plaintiffs (K.G. Eldhose and Ammini). The court permitted amendment of the original suit to include prayers for restraining the defendant from using an additional portion of property (part of Schedule A) and to reinstate a compound wall, in addition to the existing prayer against unauthorized use of the B schedule way. The court found that the amendment did not change the nature of the suit and would not prejudice the defendant who has no claimed rights over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
23-Nov-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
02-Nov-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
07-Oct-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
03-Sep-2024
Issues
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
06-Aug-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
27-Jun-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
27-Mar-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
13-Feb-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
04-Nov-2023
Issues
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
21-Sep-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
02-Aug-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
01-Jun-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
21-Mar-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
22-Feb-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
01-Dec-2022
For Hearing
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
20-Sep-2022
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
13-Jun-2022
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
14-Feb-2022
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
27-Oct-2021
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
28-Jun-2021
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
30-Mar-2021
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
20-Nov-2020
No sitting notified
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
10-Aug-2020
No sitting notified
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
06-Apr-2020
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
14-Feb-2020
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
08-Jan-2020
Call with IA
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
15-Nov-2019
Call on
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
11-Oct-2019
Objection
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
23-Sep-2019
Issues
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
02-Jul-2019
Written Statement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
09-Apr-2019
Written Statement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
14-Feb-2019
Written Statement
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
04-Dec-2018
Call on
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
22-Oct-2018
Prays time
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
04-Oct-2018
For Steps
Munsiff Perumbavoor
-
29-Sep-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 300272/2018
Summary The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor allowed the amendment petition filed by the plaintiffs (K.G. Eldhose and Ammini). The court permitted amendment of the original suit to include prayers for restraining the defendant from using an additional portion of property (part of Schedule A) and to reinstate a compound wall, in addition to the existing prayer against unauthorized use of the B schedule way. The court found that the amendment did not change the nature of the suit and would not prejudice the defendant who has no claimed rights over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts