SAW MILL OWNERS AND PLYWOOD MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION vs M H Riyas Advocate - MUHAMMED ABBAS M I — 300145/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER VII RULE 1. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

For Hearing Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER420002742025

e-Filing Number

27-06-2025

Filing Number

300321/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

300145/2025

Registration Date

27-Jun-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Munsiff Perumbavoor

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER VII RULE 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAW MILL OWNERS AND PLYWOOD MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION

    Adv. Asitha M M

  2. 2.The first Plaintiff represented by its president Mujeeb Rehman

    Adv. Asitha M M

  3. 3.First Plaintiff represented by its Secretary Shafeek P K

    Adv. Asitha M M

  4. 4.First Plaintiff represented by its Treasurer CM Ashraf

    Adv. Asitha M M

  5. 5.First Plaintiff represented by its vice president Babu Saidaly

    Adv. Asitha M M

  6. 6.First Plaintiff represented by its vice president Saidu Kunju PM

    Adv. Asitha M M

  7. 7.First Plaintiff represented by its vice president Thomas PR alias Shaji Raphael

    Adv. Asitha M M

  8. 8.First Plaintiff represented by its vice president Khalid PH

    Adv. Asitha M M

  9. 9.First Plaintiff represented by its Joint Secretary Shameer K A

    Adv. Asitha M M

  10. 10.The First Plaintiff represented by its Joint Secretary Jameer M K

    Adv. Asitha M M

  11. 11.The First Plaintiff represented by its Joint Secretary Alvinshan

    Adv. Asitha M M

  12. 12.The First Plaintiff represented by its Joint Secretary C S Moitheenkunju

    Adv. Asitha M M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M H Riyas Advocate - MUHAMMED ABBAS M I

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  4. 20-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  5. 14-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  6. 14-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by M.H. Riyas and others (elected office-bearers in June 2025) against the Sawmill Owners and Plywood Manufacturers Association (SOPMA) and office-bearers elected in August 2024 was dismissed. The court found that the General Body meeting held on 29 August 2024 was validly convened with proper notice, adequate quorum (330+ members attended), and in compliance with the association's bye-laws, making the election of respondents 2-12 as office-bearers legal and binding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  9. 08-Oct-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  13. 23-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  14. 12-Aug-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  16. 02-Aug-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  17. 26-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  18. 26-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  19. 27-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300145/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by M.H. Riyas and others (elected office-bearers in June 2025) against the Sawmill Owners and Plywood Manufacturers Association (SOPMA) and office-bearers elected in August 2024 was dismissed. The court found that the General Body meeting held on 29 August 2024 was validly convened with proper notice, adequate quorum (330+ members attended), and in compliance with the association's bye-laws, making the election of respondents 2-12 as office-bearers legal and binding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case