Nandakumaran Kartha vs Maniyan — 300163/2001

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26,O7,R1. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER420000032001

FOR HEARING

Next Hearing

21st May 2026

Filing Number

300163/2001

Filing Date

02-05-2001

Registration No

300163/2001

Registration Date

02-05-2001

Court

Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Munsiff Perumbavoor

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26,O7,R1
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Nandakumaran KarthaManiyan
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Application to Receive Documents Section ManiyanNandakumaran Kartha

Petitioner(s)

Nandakumaran Kartha

Respondent(s)

Maniyan

Jayan

Omanakunjamma

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff Perumbavoor

19-03-2026

FOR HEARING

16-03-2026

Defence Evidence

10-03-2026

Defence Evidence

03-03-2026

Defence Evidence

23-01-2026

Listed to

Interim Orders

04-07-2024
Order
22-01-2025
Order

Summary: The petition seeking to remit back the Advocate Commissioner's report was allowed. The court found that the commission report was insufficient to adjudicate the property dispute, as the disputed way described in the partition deed (Document No. 1195/2000) was not properly identified and demarcated. The court remitted the matter back to the Advocate Commissioner with directions to properly identify the property boundaries and the disputed way, with a new surveyor appointed to assist. The Advocate Commissioner is directed to complete the revised report within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition seeking to remit back the Advocate Commissioner's report was allowed. The court found that the commission report was insufficient to adjudicate the property dispute, as the disputed way described in the partition deed (Document No. 1195/2000) was not properly identified and demarcated. The court remitted the matter back to the Advocate Commissioner with directions to properly identify the property boundaries and the disputed way, with a new surveyor appointed to assist. The Advocate Commissioner is directed to complete the revised report within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case