Kamalakshi vs Thankamma Advocate - G Santhosh Kumar — 300365/2005

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section OrderVIIrule1sec.26. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER420000022005

Filing Number

300365/2005

Filing Date

30-Nov-2005

Registration No

300365/2005

Registration Date

30-Nov-2005

Court

Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Munsiff Perumbavoor

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section OrderVIIrule1sec.26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamalakshi

    Adv. M K Jayapalan, M K Jayapalan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thankamma Advocate - G Santhosh Kumar

  2. 2.Saradha

    Adv. G Santhosh Kumar

  3. 3.Sobhana

    Adv. M G Jayachandran

  4. 4.Radhamani

    Adv. M G Jayachandran

  5. 5.Ramesan

  6. 6.Ajitha

  7. 7.Mallika

    Adv. B Reghukumar,GEORGE MATHEW

  8. 8.Ponnamma

    Adv. P Joseph Sebastian,SANTHOSH V K SAHEERA K.A

  9. 9.Jayanandan

    Adv. P T Geevarghese

  10. 10.Sivarajan

    Adv. P T Geevarghese

  11. 11.Sukumaran

    Adv. P T Geevarghese

  12. 12.Vijayan

    Adv. M G Jayachandran

  13. 13.Gopalan

  14. 14.Narayanan

  15. 15.Sasidharan

  16. 16.Ravi

  17. 17.Parameswaran

  18. 18.Dharmapalan

  19. 19.Indira

  20. 20.Dileepkumar

  21. 21.Chandrika

  22. 22.Sudhev

  23. 23.Thulasi

  24. 24.Prasad

  25. 25.Sobhana

  26. 26.Sandeep

  27. 27.Sandya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    for evidence.

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  13. 15-Jan-2026

    Further evidence

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  14. 12-Dec-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    For return of summons

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  17. 26-Sep-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  18. 22-Aug-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  19. 04-Aug-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  20. 02-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  21. 02-Aug-2025

    Disposed

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  22. 27-Nov-2015

    Order Number 3

    Summary The Munsiff's Court dismissed Kamalakshi's suit as not maintainable under CPC Order 21 Rules 97-103, holding that she should have filed a petition before the execution court rather than a separate suit to challenge the earlier partition decree (O.S.No.210/94) and property delivery. The court clarified that even third parties claiming independent rights over decretal property must approach the execution court through prescribed procedural remedies, not through fresh civil suits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 27-Nov-2015

    —

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  24. 27-Nov-2015

    Disposed

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  25. 16-Nov-2015

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  26. 12-Nov-2015

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  27. 04-Nov-2015

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  28. 04-Jul-2015

    Listed to

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  29. 03-Jun-2015

    Call on

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  30. 26-May-2015

    For Admission

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  31. 26-May-2015

    Issue notice

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  32. 26-May-2015

    Restored

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  33. 09-Jan-2014

    Order Number 1

  34. 09-Jan-2014

    Order Number 2

  35. 09-Jan-2014

    Disposed

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  36. 21-Nov-2013

    For commission report

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  37. 30-Oct-2013

    For commission report

    Munsiff Perumbavoor

  38. 31-Aug-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 30-Nov-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300365/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Munsiff's Court dismissed Kamalakshi's suit as not maintainable under CPC Order 21 Rules 97-103, holding that she should have filed a petition before the execution court rather than a separate suit to challenge the earlier partition decree (O.S.No.210/94) and property delivery. The court clarified that even third parties claiming independent rights over decretal property must approach the execution court through prescribed procedural remedies, not through fresh civil suits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case