Shaju vs M/S/Medi Care Surgecals Advocate - N.J Prince — 200053/2022

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26O7R1. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Listed to Next hearing 03-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER410003432022

Filing Number

200326/2022

Filing Date

17-Dec-2022

Registration No

200053/2022

Registration Date

17-Dec-2022

Court

Sub Court, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shaju

    Adv. Adv.N.C.Mohanan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S/Medi Care Surgecals Advocate - N.J Prince

  2. 2.Ashadevi

    Adv. N.J Prince

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  3. 16-Dec-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  4. 17-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  5. 17-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  6. 23-Sep-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  7. 10-Sep-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  8. 15-Jul-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  9. 17-Jun-2025

    For Steps

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  10. 30-May-2025

    For Steps

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  11. 01-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  12. 13-Feb-2025

    Report on mediation

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  13. 29-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  14. 25-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  15. 20-Jan-2025

    Report on mediation

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  16. 10-Dec-2024

    For Steps

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  17. 20-Nov-2024

    OrderView PDF

  18. 20-Nov-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by defendants Medicare Surgicals and Asha Devi to send a cheque for forensic handwriting examination at FSL, Thiruvananthapuram has been dismissed. The court found that while the plaint's language was ambiguous regarding who wrote the cheque contents, the plaintiff explicitly stated in his objection that he did not claim the handwriting was by the 2nd defendant, making forensic examination unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 20-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  20. 08-Nov-2024

    Order/Judgement

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  21. 01-Nov-2024

    For Objection and hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  22. 03-Apr-2024

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  23. 23-Feb-2024

    For Steps

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  24. 22-Nov-2023

    For Steps

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  25. 20-Sep-2023

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  26. 07-Sep-2023

    For settlement

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  27. 24-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  28. 04-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  29. 19-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

  30. 17-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 17-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200053/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by defendants Medicare Surgicals and Asha Devi to send a cheque for forensic handwriting examination at FSL, Thiruvananthapuram has been dismissed. The court found that while the plaint's language was ambiguous regarding who wrote the cheque contents, the plaintiff explicitly stated in his objection that he did not claim the handwriting was by the 2nd defendant, making forensic examination unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case