Shaju vs M/S/Medi Care Surgecals Advocate - N.J Prince — 200053/2022

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26O7R1. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER410003432022

Listed to

Next Hearing

03rd July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200326/2022

Filing Date

17-12-2022

Registration No

200053/2022

Registration Date

17-12-2022

Court

Sub Court, Perumbavoor

Judge

1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26O7R1
IA/4/2025 Classification : Section ShajuM/S/Medi Care Surgecals
IA/5/2025 Classification : Section ShajuM/S/Medi Care Surgecals
IA/6/2025 Classification : Section ShajuM/S/Medi Care Surgecals
IA/1/2026 Classification : Petition To Remove From List Section ShajuM/S/Medi Care Surgecals

Petitioner(s)

Shaju

Adv. Adv.N.C.Mohanan

Respondent(s)

M/S/Medi Care Surgecals Advocate - N.J Prince

Ashadevi

Adv. N.J Prince

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor

09-03-2026

Listed to

16-12-2025

Listed to

17-11-2025

Call on

17-10-2025

Call on

23-09-2025

For Objection and hearing

Interim Orders

20-11-2024
Order
20-11-2024
Order

Summary: The petition filed by defendants Medicare Surgicals and Asha Devi to send a cheque for forensic handwriting examination at FSL, Thiruvananthapuram has been dismissed. The court found that while the plaint's language was ambiguous regarding who wrote the cheque contents, the plaintiff explicitly stated in his objection that he did not claim the handwriting was by the 2nd defendant, making forensic examination unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by defendants Medicare Surgicals and Asha Devi to send a cheque for forensic handwriting examination at FSL, Thiruvananthapuram has been dismissed. The court found that while the plaint's language was ambiguous regarding who wrote the cheque contents, the plaintiff explicitly stated in his objection that he did not claim the handwriting was by the 2nd defendant, making forensic examination unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Perumbavoor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case