Ujwal Garg vs C M Mathew Advocate - D1&D2 Naveen Thomas (MAShaija CP -Ph- — 200050/2020
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26, O7, R1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER410001492020
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200165/2020
Filing Date
25-08-2020
Registration No
200050/2020
Registration Date
25-08-2020
Court
Sub Court, Perumbavoor
Judge
1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ujwal Garg
Adv. K S Sajeevkumar
Respondent(s)
C M Mathew Advocate - D1&D2 Naveen Thomas (MAShaija CP -Ph-
C M Varghese
Adv. Naveen Thomas
Priyamol Baby
Adv. Naveen Thomas
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor
Issues
Issues
For Objection and hearing
For Objection and hearing
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 27-02-2026 | For Objection and hearing | |
| 20-02-2026 | For Objection and hearing | |
| 07-02-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Suit Decreed – The plaintiff's suit for declaration and recovery of possession was allowed. The court declared that the auction sale dated 13-06-2013, the resulting sale certificate dated 26-11-2013, and subsequent sale deeds (No. 6907/2014 and No. 7376/2014) are null and void. The plaintiff was granted recovery of possession of the disputed property based on his original title, as the earlier ex parte decree against him had been set aside by the Kerala High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Suit Decreed – The plaintiff's suit for declaration and recovery of possession was allowed. The court declared that the auction sale dated 13-06-2013, the resulting sale certificate dated 26-11-2013, and subsequent sale deeds (No. 6907/2014 and No. 7376/2014) are null and void. The plaintiff was granted recovery of possession of the disputed property based on his original title, as the earlier ex parte decree against him had been set aside by the Kerala High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts