Sajan J. Pynunkal vs K.C. Jose Advocate - P.T. Geevarghese — 200056/2009
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order21,Rule10and11.. Status: With connected case. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLER410000392009
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200056/2009
Filing Date
28-11-2009
Registration No
200056/2009
Registration Date
28-11-2009
Court
Sub Court, Perumbavoor
Judge
1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sajan J. Pynunkal
Adv. Saiby Jose Kidangoor
Respondent(s)
K.C. Jose Advocate - P.T. Geevarghese
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor
With connected case
Settlement of proclamation
Settlement of proclamation
Objection
For balance statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | With connected case | |
| 21-03-2026 | Settlement of proclamation | |
| 10-03-2026 | Settlement of proclamation | |
| 27-02-2026 | Objection | |
| 19-02-2026 | For balance statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The judgment debtor K.C. Jose filed a petition seeking review of the July 14, 2022 order that restored an execution petition (EP) to file. The court dismissed the review petition, holding that the decree holder was entitled to file a restoration petition under Section 151 of the CPC (not Order 21 Rule 106) and could seek condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found no error in the earlier restoration order and rejected all allegations of the judgment debtor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The judgment debtor K.C. Jose filed a petition seeking review of the July 14, 2022 order that restored an execution petition (EP) to file. The court dismissed the review petition, holding that the decree holder was entitled to file a restoration petition under Section 151 of the CPC (not Order 21 Rule 106) and could seek condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found no error in the earlier restoration order and rejected all allegations of the judgment debtor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts