Jyothi V S vs K Thyagarajeshwaran — 300029/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.
CNR: KLER380013252024
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
23-05-2024
Filing Number
1325/2024
Filing Date
23-05-2024
Registration No
300029/2024
Registration Date
24-07-2024
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court2 Aluva
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Aluva
FIR Details
Police Station
ELAMAKKARA
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jyothi V S
Adv. Dr SANTHOSH KUMAR K
Respondent(s)
K Thyagarajeshwaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Aluva
Call on
for evidence.
for evidence.
for evidence.
for evidence.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Call on | |
| 05-02-2026 | for evidence. | |
| 24-01-2026 | for evidence. | |
| 03-12-2025 | for evidence. | |
| 05-11-2025 | for evidence. |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was allowed in part. The court directed the respondent (husband) not to commit any act of domestic violence against the petitioner, not to alienate the shared household where the petitioner resides, and not to obstruct her peaceful residence. However, the court denied the petitioner's request for monthly maintenance of Rs. 10,000, finding her capable of self-support as a law graduate and employed professional, while deferring the maintenance issue to evidence at a later stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was allowed in part. The court directed the respondent (husband) not to commit any act of domestic violence against the petitioner, not to alienate the shared household where the petitioner resides, and not to obstruct her peaceful residence. However, the court denied the petitioner's request for monthly maintenance of Rs. 10,000, finding her capable of self-support as a law graduate and employed professional, while deferring the maintenance issue to evidence at a later stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts