state of kerala vs davis — 300331/2015
Case under Charitable and Religious Trust Act, 1920 Section 24. Status: For hearing in CMP. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLER380001022016
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
300331/2015
Filing Date
08-03-2016
Registration No
300331/2015
Registration Date
08-03-2016
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court2 Aluva
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Aluva
FIR Details
FIR Number
339
Police Station
BINANIPURAM
Year
2007
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state of kerala
Respondent(s)
davis
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Aluva
For hearing in CMP
For Objection and hearing
For cross examination.
Call on
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | For hearing in CMP | |
| 10-03-2026 | For Objection and hearing | |
| 02-02-2026 | For cross examination. | |
| 31-01-2026 | Call on | |
| 24-01-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by the accused under Section 311 Cr.P.C to recall all 14 prosecution witnesses for cross-examination was allowed in part and dismissed in part. The court allowed recall of only witness PW4 (who was not cross-examined earlier) for cross-examination, subject to payment of Rs. 300 as witness cost. The prayer to recall all other witnesses was dismissed, as the accused had already been given adequate opportunities to cross-examine them and change of counsel is not valid grounds to reopen evidence under settled Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by the accused under Section 311 Cr.P.C to recall all 14 prosecution witnesses for cross-examination was allowed in part and dismissed in part. The court allowed recall of only witness PW4 (who was not cross-examined earlier) for cross-examination, subject to payment of Rs. 300 as witness cost. The prayer to recall all other witnesses was dismissed, as the accused had already been given adequate opportunities to cross-examine them and change of counsel is not valid grounds to reopen evidence under settled Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts