Loovis vs Thomas — 100791/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1Sec26. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Call on Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER360010522014

Filing Number

101769/2014

Filing Date

19-Nov-2014

Registration No

100791/2014

Registration Date

19-Nov-2014

Court

Munsiff Court, Aluva

Judge

1-Munsiff Aluva

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1Sec26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Loovis

    Adv. M B Sudarsanakumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thomas

  2. 2.Moly

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  3. 06-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  4. 18-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  5. 09-Sep-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  6. 12-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  7. 23-Jul-2025

    Appearance of Petitioner

    Munsiff Aluva

  8. 10-Jun-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff Aluva

  9. 21-May-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff Aluva

  10. 08-Apr-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Aluva

  11. 05-Mar-2025

    Await report

    Munsiff Aluva

  12. 18-Feb-2025

    Await report

    Munsiff Aluva

  13. 13-Feb-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  14. 07-Feb-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  15. 04-Feb-2025

    Issue notice

    Munsiff Aluva

  16. 23-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  17. 05-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  18. 05-Nov-2024

    Restored

    Munsiff Aluva

  19. 05-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  20. 29-Feb-2020

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary OS No. 791/2014 - Munsiff Court, Aluva The suit for recovery of Rs. 8,00,000/- advance sale consideration was dismissed with costs. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the execution of the alleged sale agreement dated 09.04.2013, as the signatures on pages 2-4 differed significantly from page 1, and witnesses could not credibly testify to the defendants' execution of the full document. Without proving the agreement's execution, the claim for refund of the advance amount could not be established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 29-Feb-2020

    Disposed

    Munsiff Aluva

  22. 24-Feb-2020

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Aluva

  23. 10-Feb-2020

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Aluva

  24. 29-Jan-2020

    For further hearing

    Munsiff Aluva

  25. 18-Jan-2020

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Aluva

  26. 14-Jan-2020

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Aluva

  27. 07-Jan-2020

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Aluva

  28. 13-Dec-2019

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Aluva

  29. 11-Dec-2019

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Aluva

  30. 29-Nov-2019

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Aluva

  31. 25-Nov-2019

    For reports

    Munsiff Aluva

  32. 16-Nov-2019

    For reports

    Munsiff Aluva

  33. 08-Nov-2019

    For reports

    Munsiff Aluva

  34. 28-Oct-2019

    Defence Evidence

    Munsiff Aluva

  35. 27-Oct-2019

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  36. 24-Aug-2019

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Munsiff Aluva

  37. 16-Aug-2019

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Munsiff Aluva

  38. 06-Aug-2019

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Munsiff Aluva

  39. 01-Aug-2019

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Munsiff Aluva

  40. 20-Jul-2019

    Return of summons

    Munsiff Aluva

  41. 15-Jul-2019

    Summons in Ca

    Munsiff Aluva

  42. 05-Jul-2019

    For reports

    Munsiff Aluva

  43. 21-May-2019

    Listed to

    Munsiff Aluva

  44. 05-Apr-2019

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  45. 02-Apr-2019

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  46. 08-Mar-2019

    Listed to

    Munsiff Aluva

  47. 25-Jan-2019

    Listed to

    Munsiff Aluva

  48. 03-Dec-2018

    For Steps

    Munsiff Aluva

  49. 20-Aug-2018

    Listed to

    Munsiff Aluva

  50. 20-Jul-2018

    For Steps

    Munsiff Aluva

  51. 30-Jun-2018

    For Steps

    Munsiff Aluva

  52. 31-May-2018

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Aluva

  53. 03-Mar-2018

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Aluva

  54. 28-Nov-2017

    For reports

    Munsiff Aluva

  55. 17-Jun-2017

    Call on

    Munsiff Aluva

  56. 04-Feb-2017

    Issues

    Munsiff Aluva

  57. 30-Nov-2016

    Issues

    Munsiff Aluva

  58. 17-Aug-2016

    Issues

    Munsiff Aluva

  59. 08-Apr-2016

    Issues

    Munsiff Aluva

  60. 03-Feb-2016

    Issues

    Munsiff Aluva

  61. 27-Nov-2015

    Issues

    Munsiff Aluva

  62. 18-Aug-2015

    Issues

    Munsiff Aluva

  63. 01-Jun-2015

    Issues

    Munsiff Aluva

  64. 02-Mar-2015

    For Counter

    Munsiff Aluva

  65. 19-Dec-2014

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Aluva

  66. 19-Nov-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 19-Nov-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100791/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary OS No. 791/2014 - Munsiff Court, Aluva The suit for recovery of Rs. 8,00,000/- advance sale consideration was dismissed with costs. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the execution of the alleged sale agreement dated 09.04.2013, as the signatures on pages 2-4 differed significantly from page 1, and witnesses could not credibly testify to the defendants' execution of the full document. Without proving the agreement's execution, the claim for refund of the advance amount could not be established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case