Raghunathan Pillai vs Krishnakumar — 300183/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Status: For hearing on IA. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER320005052023
Next Hearing
30th May 2026
e-Filing Number
27-10-2023
Filing Number
475/2023
Filing Date
28-10-2023
Registration No
300183/2023
Registration Date
28-10-2023
Court
Sub Court, North Paravur
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SUB JUDGE AND ASST SESSIONS JUDGE, North Paravur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raghunathan Pillai
Adv. AIYAPPAN C
Respondent(s)
Krishnakumar
Dhurgadevi
Adv. TOMY.P.D
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SUB JUDGE AND ASST SESSIONS JUDGE, North Paravur
For hearing on IA
Listed to
Call on
Call on
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | For hearing on IA | |
| 21-01-2026 | Listed to | |
| 16-12-2025 | Call on | |
| 13-11-2025 | Call on | |
| 04-10-2025 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Summary: The suit for partition and separate possession of property is allowed and decreed. The court passed a preliminary decree of partition directing that the disputed property shall be partitioned into three shares, entitling the plaintiff to separate possession of a 1/4th share as claimed. The court rejected the defendant's contentions, finding that the plaintiff's co-ownership rights were proven through the Settlement Deed No. 4284/2014 and land tax receipts showing joint ownership and payment of taxes by both parties. No costs were ordered considering the family relationship between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The suit for partition and separate possession of property is allowed and decreed. The court passed a preliminary decree of partition directing that the disputed property shall be partitioned into three shares, entitling the plaintiff to separate possession of a 1/4th share as claimed. The court rejected the defendant's contentions, finding that the plaintiff's co-ownership rights were proven through the Settlement Deed No. 4284/2014 and land tax receipts showing joint ownership and payment of taxes by both parties. No costs were ordered considering the family relationship between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts