Raghunathan Pillai vs Krishnakumar — 300183/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Status: For hearing on IA. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.

For hearing on IA Next hearing 30-May-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER320005052023

e-Filing Number

27-10-2023

Filing Number

475/2023

Filing Date

28-Oct-2023

Registration No

300183/2023

Registration Date

28-Oct-2023

Court

Sub Court, North Paravur

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raghunathan Pillai

    Adv. AIYAPPAN C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Krishnakumar

  2. 2.Dhurgadevi

    Adv. TOMY.P.D

Case History

  1. 30-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  3. 21-Jan-2026

    Listed to

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  5. 13-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  6. 04-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    Call on

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  8. 18-Sep-2025

    Disposed

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  9. 10-Jul-2025

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The suit for partition and separate possession of property is allowed and decreed. The court passed a preliminary decree of partition directing that the disputed property shall be partitioned into three shares, entitling the plaintiff to separate possession of a 1/4th share as claimed. The court rejected the defendant's contentions, finding that the plaintiff's co-ownership rights were proven through the Settlement Deed No. 4284/2014 and land tax receipts showing joint ownership and payment of taxes by both parties. No costs were ordered considering the family relationship between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 10-Jul-2025

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  11. 05-Jul-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  12. 02-Apr-2025

    Listed to

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  13. 22-Feb-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  14. 19-Dec-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  15. 26-Oct-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  16. 14-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  17. 30-Aug-2024

    Appearance Of Parties

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  18. 13-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  19. 20-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  20. 18-Jun-2024

    No sitting notified

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  21. 27-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  22. 29-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  23. 30-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur

  24. 30-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 28-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300183/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The suit for partition and separate possession of property is allowed and decreed. The court passed a preliminary decree of partition directing that the disputed property shall be partitioned into three shares, entitling the plaintiff to separate possession of a 1/4th share as claimed. The court rejected the defendant's contentions, finding that the plaintiff's co-ownership rights were proven through the Settlement Deed No. 4284/2014 and land tax receipts showing joint ownership and payment of taxes by both parties. No costs were ordered considering the family relationship between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case