Vadakkedath Industries Pvt Ltd vs Abdul Samad — 100002/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7RULE1. Status: Stayed. Call on. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER300008962024
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
e-Filing Number
27-09-2024
Filing Number
100308/2024
Filing Date
27-09-2024
Registration No
100002/2024
Registration Date
27-09-2024
Court
Addl. District Court, North Paravur/Rent Control Appellate Authority
Judge
1-ADDL DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE-1, North Paravur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vadakkedath Industries Pvt Ltd
Adv. APARNA V S
Respondent(s)
Abdul Samad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE-1, North Paravur
Stayed. Call on
Stayed. Call on
Stayed. Call on
For Steps
Orders in IA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Stayed. Call on | |
| 12-02-2026 | Stayed. Call on | |
| 12-11-2025 | Stayed. Call on | |
| 09-10-2025 | For Steps | |
| 08-10-2025 | Orders in IA |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Additional District Court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Vadakkedath Industries Pvt. Ltd., restraining respondent Abdul Samad from using the trademark "Royana" (with a woman in niqab) for cardamom products until suit disposal. The court found the petitioner had established a prima facie case of trademark infringement under Section 29(2) of the Trademarks Act, as "Royana" and "Rabbaana" (petitioner's registered mark) are phonetically and visually similar and likely to cause consumer confusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Additional District Court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Vadakkedath Industries Pvt. Ltd., restraining respondent Abdul Samad from using the trademark "Royana" (with a woman in niqab) for cardamom products until suit disposal. The court found the petitioner had established a prima facie case of trademark infringement under Section 29(2) of the Trademarks Act, as "Royana" and "Rabbaana" (petitioner's registered mark) are phonetically and visually similar and likely to cause consumer confusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
Addl. District Court, North Paravur/Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →Explore other courts