SHO HBR PS vs Afsal Advocate - ISAC SANJAY — 300527/2024

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985\ Section 20(b)(ii)A. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Call on Next hearing 09-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLER260022222024

Filing Number

302221/2024

Filing Date

28-Nov-2024

Registration No

300527/2024

Registration Date

28-Nov-2024

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1, Kochi

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985\ Section 20(b)(ii)A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) HBR PS (Police Station)

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Afsal Advocate - ISAC SANJAY

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 30-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 07-Oct-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 17-Sep-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The discharge petition filed by Afsal, aged 21/24, accused of possessing 350.87 grams of ganja under Section 20(b) II A of the NDPS Act, was dismissed. The court found that the allegations were not groundless, as contraband was seized from the petitioner's possession and chemical analysis confirmed it was ganja. While the court acknowledged alleged procedural non-compliances with Sections 50, 52A, and 57 of the NDPS Act, it held these provisions are directory rather than mandatory and such issues must be examined during trial. The veracity of the search, seizure, and prosecution can only be properly evaluated at the trial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 02-Sep-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 30-Aug-2025

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 27-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 22-Aug-2025

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 18-Aug-2025

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 14-Jul-2025

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 28-Jun-2025

    Call with Mp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 18-Jun-2025

    Issue notice

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 30-May-2025

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 28-May-2025

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 26-May-2025

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 22-May-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 19-May-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 03-Apr-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 05-Mar-2025

    To record plea of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 25-Jan-2025

    To record plea of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 17-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 28-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300527/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The discharge petition filed by Afsal, aged 21/24, accused of possessing 350.87 grams of ganja under Section 20(b) II A of the NDPS Act, was dismissed. The court found that the allegations were not groundless, as contraband was seized from the petitioner's possession and chemical analysis confirmed it was ganja. While the court acknowledged alleged procedural non-compliances with Sections 50, 52A, and 57 of the NDPS Act, it held these provisions are directory rather than mandatory and such issues must be examined during trial. The veracity of the search, seizure, and prosecution can only be properly evaluated at the trial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case