A V Thomas and Company limited vs Indian Steels — 301496/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: To record plea of the accused. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLER260019532024
Filing Number
301952/2024
Filing Date
20-Jul-2024
Registration No
301496/2024
Registration Date
20-Jul-2024
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1, Kochi
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A V Thomas and Company limited
Adv. M Sajevan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Indian Steels
-
2.Bijulal Moni
-
3.Santhosh Kumar
-
4.Vinod Lal
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Mar-2026
To record plea of the accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2026
To record plea of the accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2026
To record plea of the accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
31-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Kochi allowed the application filed by accused persons Santhosh Kuma and Vinod Lal (partners of Indian Steels) in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court dispensed with their personal appearance in all proceedings, subject to the condition that they appear before the court as and when directed, since they are currently employed and residing abroad and had already authorized their counsel to represent them in all matters including recording pleas and examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jan-2026
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2026
Oders in Cmp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2026
Oders in Cmp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Jan-2026
Oders in Cmp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Call with Mp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2025
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Aug-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2025
Referred to Mediator
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
29-Jul-2025
Referred to Mediator
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-Jul-2025
Referred to Mediator
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Jun-2025
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2025
Call with Mp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-May-2025
Oders in Cmp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Apr-2025
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Apr-2025
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2025
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2025
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
15-Mar-2025
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2025
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2025
For Objection and hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Jan-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Dec-2024
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2024
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2024
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
25-Oct-2024
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Oct-2024
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Sep-2024
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 301496/2024
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Kochi allowed the application filed by accused persons Santhosh Kuma and Vinod Lal (partners of Indian Steels) in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court dispensed with their personal appearance in all proceedings, subject to the condition that they appear before the court as and when directed, since they are currently employed and residing abroad and had already authorized their counsel to represent them in all matters including recording pleas and examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts