State of Kerala vs Antony Federic Baiju Advocate - GOPI K P — 300284/2024
Case under Ipc \ Section 341,506,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 320(8) CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLER260017682024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
301768/2024
Filing Date
19-04-2024
Registration No
300284/2024
Registration Date
19-04-2024
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1, Kochi
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 320(8) CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
434
Police Station
KANNAMALY
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Antony Federic Baiju Advocate - GOPI K P
Sreya Baiju
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
With connected case
With connected case
Appearance of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 05-03-2026 | With connected case | |
| 03-03-2026 | With connected case | |
| 13-02-2026 | Appearance of Accused |
Final Orders / Judgements
Judgement
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Kochi First Class Magistrate dismissed the accused's discharge application in a property dispute case. The court found prima facie evidence supporting charges under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint) and 506 (criminal intimidation) against Antony Frederic Baiju and Sreya Baiju, as witness statements established that the accused restrained the complainant's son while he was constructing a compound wall and threatened him with false cases, despite inconsistencies in witness testimonies and a delay in filing the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Kochi First Class Magistrate dismissed the accused's discharge application in a property dispute case. The court found prima facie evidence supporting charges under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint) and 506 (criminal intimidation) against Antony Frederic Baiju and Sreya Baiju, as witness statements established that the accused restrained the complainant's son while he was constructing a compound wall and threatened him with false cases, despite inconsistencies in witness testimonies and a delay in filing the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts