Union Bank Of India vs Prabeesha V P — 200260/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 26 Order IV, VI and VII. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 24th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER250006072024
e-Filing Number
31-10-2024
Filing Number
200648/2024
Filing Date
13-11-2024
Registration No
200260/2024
Registration Date
13-11-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Kochi
Judge
2-Addl.Munsiff Kochi
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Union Bank Of India
Adv. KRISHNA KUMAR S
Respondent(s)
Prabeesha V P
Sruthi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl.Munsiff Kochi
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
for evidence.
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Order/Judgement | |
| 12-03-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | for evidence. | |
| 03-03-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Judgement
Interim Orders
The Munsiff Court in Kochi allowed the defendants' petitions to condone a 82-day delay in filing and set aside an ex-parte order dated 11.07.2025 passed against them in Union Bank of India's money recovery suit. The court found the defendants had shown sufficient cause for the delay due to illness (chickenpox) and readiness to settle, deciding it was fair to give them another opportunity to file a written statement and contest the case on merits, while imposing ₹1,000 cost on the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Munsiff Court in Kochi allowed the defendants' petitions to condone a 82-day delay in filing and set aside an ex-parte order dated 11.07.2025 passed against them in Union Bank of India's money recovery suit. The court found the defendants had shown sufficient cause for the delay due to illness (chickenpox) and readiness to settle, deciding it was fair to give them another opportunity to file a written statement and contest the case on merits, while imposing ₹1,000 cost on the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts