Vimala vs Francis Xavier@ Savi Advocate - NANDAKUMAR.A — 200344/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER250005822020

For commission report

Next Hearing

21st May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200601/2020

Filing Date

14-12-2020

Registration No

200344/2020

Registration Date

14-12-2020

Court

Munsiff Court, Kochi

Judge

1-Prl.Munsiff Kochi

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 26
IA/12/2025 Classification : Section VimalaFrancis Xavier@ Savi
IA/13/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section VimalaFrancis Xavier@ Savi
IA/14/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section VimalaFrancis Xavier@ Savi
IA/15/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section VimalaFrancis Xavier@ Savi
IA/16/2025 Classification : Carbon Copy Application Section Francis Xavier@ SaviVimala
IA/17/2025 Classification : Petition Section Francis Xavier@ SaviVimala
IA/18/2025 Classification : Petition To Accept Photocopy Section Francis Xavier@ SaviVimala
IA/19/2025 Classification : Carbon Copy Application Section Francis Xavier@ SaviVimala
IA/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Vimala
IA/2/2026 Classification : Today Moving Petition Section Vimala
IA/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section Vimala
IA/4/2026 Classification : Injunction Application Section Vimala

Petitioner(s)

Vimala

Adv. A Anilkumar

Respondent(s)

Francis Xavier@ Savi Advocate - NANDAKUMAR.A

Mary

Adv. NANDAKUMAR.A,PADMINI DEVI C

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Prl.Munsiff Kochi

27-03-2026

For commission report

12-03-2026

For commission report

09-03-2026

For commission report

26-02-2026

For commission report

23-02-2026

For commission report

Interim Orders

28-09-2024
Order
28-09-2024
Order
28-09-2024
Order
09-10-2025
Final Order
25-11-2025
Order
19-12-2025
Order
19-12-2025
Order

Summary The Munsiff's Court, Kochi dismissed a petition filed by the 2nd defendant challenging the plaintiff's legal standing to institute the suit. The court held that the issue of locus standi is a pure question of fact requiring evidence, not a preliminary issue under CPC Order 14 Rule 2(2), and therefore lacks merit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

27-03-2026

Order

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Munsiff's Court, Kochi dismissed a petition filed by the 2nd defendant challenging the plaintiff's legal standing to institute the suit. The court held that the issue of locus standi is a pure question of fact requiring evidence, not a preliminary issue under CPC Order 14 Rule 2(2), and therefore lacks merit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Kochi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case