Muraleedhara Pai K R vs Geetha Anand Advocate - RAJU JOSEPH — 200184/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 7 rule 1 and 26. Status: Call with IA. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER250004072024
e-Filing Number
25-07-2024
Filing Number
200427/2024
Filing Date
26-Jul-2024
Registration No
200184/2024
Registration Date
26-Jul-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Kochi
Judge
2-Addl.Munsiff Kochi
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muraleedhara Pai K R
Adv. ANIL KUMAR A, BALAMURALIKRISHNA C U
-
2.G Jaya
Adv. ANIL KUMAR A,BALAMURALIKRISHNA C U
-
3.Lakshmi Priya K M Pai
Adv. ANIL KUMAR A,BALAMURALIKRISHNA C U
Respondent(s)
-
1.Geetha Anand Advocate - RAJU JOSEPH
-
2.Vinod Anand
-
3.Rajesh Anand
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
19-Mar-2026
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
13-Mar-2026
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
11-Mar-2026
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
07-Mar-2026
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
21-Feb-2026
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
07-Feb-2026
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
17-Jan-2026
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
20-Dec-2025
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
05-Dec-2025
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
26-Nov-2025
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
20-Nov-2025
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
05-Nov-2025
Final OrderView PDF
Case Summary I.A. No. 13/2025 in O.S. No. 184/2024 – Court of the Munsiff, Kochi Petition Dismissed Without Cost The defendants' petition to implead Kochi Thirumala Devasom as an additional party in an injunction suit was dismissed. The court found that the defendants failed to produce prima facie evidence that the Devasom owns the disputed 2 cents of land, and concluded that since the suit involves only injunctive relief (not ownership adjudication), the Devasom is not a necessary party under CPC Order I Rule 10(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Nov-2025
Call on
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
28-Oct-2025
Orders in IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
09-Oct-2025
Call on
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
18-Sep-2025
For Hearing
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
08-Sep-2025
For hearing on IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
12-Aug-2025
For hearing on IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
18-Jul-2025
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
27-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
19-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
-
19-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
17-Jun-2025
Orders in IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
10-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
09-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
23-May-2025
For Hearing
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
29-Mar-2025
For Hearing
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
20-Mar-2025
Call on
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
27-Feb-2025
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
25-Feb-2025
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
20-Feb-2025
For Steps
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
16-Jan-2025
For Steps
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
12-Dec-2024
For Steps
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
05-Dec-2024
Repeat Summons
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
03-Dec-2024
Repeat Summons
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
04-Nov-2024
Repeat Summons
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
19-Oct-2024
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
17-Oct-2024
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
13-Sep-2024
Return of summons
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
09-Sep-2024
Call with IA
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
07-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
29-Aug-2024
Issue summons to defendants. For return of Summons
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
17-Aug-2024
Issue summons to defendants. For return of Summons
Addl.Munsiff Kochi
-
26-Jul-2024
OrderView PDF
-
26-Jul-2024
OrderView PDF
-
26-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 200184/2024
Case Summary I.A. No. 13/2025 in O.S. No. 184/2024 – Court of the Munsiff, Kochi Petition Dismissed Without Cost The defendants' petition to implead Kochi Thirumala Devasom as an additional party in an injunction suit was dismissed. The court found that the defendants failed to produce prima facie evidence that the Devasom owns the disputed 2 cents of land, and concluded that since the suit involves only injunctive relief (not ownership adjudication), the Devasom is not a necessary party under CPC Order I Rule 10(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts