Kamalanatha Pai vs Santha Bai Advocate - Dileep D — 200117/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Stayed by High Court. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER250002372025

Stayed by High Court

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

e-Filing Number

03-06-2025

Filing Number

263/2025

Filing Date

04-06-2025

Registration No

200117/2025

Registration Date

04-06-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Kochi

Judge

1-Prl.Munsiff Kochi

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Petition to Set Aside Order / Decree Section Santha BaiKamalanatha Pai
Ia/5/2025 Classification : Petition Section Santha BaiKamalanatha Pai
Ia/6/2025 Classification : Petition for Police Assistance Section Kamalanatha PaiSantha Bai

Petitioner(s)

Kamalanatha Pai

Adv. ANIL KUMAR A

Suresh Kumar

Adv. ANIL KUMAR A,ANIL KUMAR A

Respondent(s)

Santha Bai Advocate - Dileep D

K Dinesh Prabhu

Adv. Dileep D

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Prl.Munsiff Kochi

25-03-2026

Stayed by High Court

07-03-2026

Call on

21-02-2026

Call on

12-02-2026

Pre trial steps

10-02-2026

Call with IA

Interim Orders

01-08-2025
Final Order

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed - The Munsiff Court of Kochi granted an interim prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' minor repair work on their residential property. The court found the plaintiffs have a prima facie case and balance of convenience in their favor, given their lifetime residence rights under a 1985 settlement deed and the building's uninhabitable condition requiring urgent repairs (roof covering, floor and window repairs). The injunction remains valid until the main suit's disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

12-02-2026

Order

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed - The Munsiff Court of Kochi granted an interim prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' minor repair work on their residential property. The court found the plaintiffs have a prima facie case and balance of convenience in their favor, given their lifetime residence rights under a 1985 settlement deed and the building's uninhabitable condition requiring urgent repairs (roof covering, floor and window repairs). The injunction remains valid until the main suit's disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Kochi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case