Joy Figarado vs Shihab T A Advocate - ADAM AMBROSE P, TRESA RANI GEORGE, TRESA RANI GEORGERAVIJI K K, — 200006/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: For further hearing. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLER250000762022
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
200085/2022
Filing Date
02-02-2022
Registration No
200006/2022
Registration Date
02-02-2022
Court
Munsiff Court, Kochi
Judge
2-Addl.Munsiff Kochi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Joy Figarado
Adv. SANTHOSH PETER MAMALAYIL, ANOOP.P.N
Romy Figarado
Adv. SANTHOSH PETER MAMALAYIL,ANOOP.P.N
Respondent(s)
Shihab T A Advocate - ADAM AMBROSE P, TRESA RANI GEORGE, TRESA RANI GEORGERAVIJI K K,
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl.Munsiff Kochi
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 21-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary The Court of the Munsiff & Rent Controller, Kochi, allowed both interim applications (IA No. 21/2025 and IA No. 22/2025), permitting the petitioner to add the Secretary of Elamkunnapuzha Grama Panchayat as a witness and issue summons to him. However, the court imposed conditions restricting the witness's testimony to producing assessment registers and building records related to the property, and ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 1,000 as costs to the respondent due to the delayed filing of the applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Court of the Munsiff & Rent Controller, Kochi, allowed both interim applications (IA No. 21/2025 and IA No. 22/2025), permitting the petitioner to add the Secretary of Elamkunnapuzha Grama Panchayat as a witness and issue summons to him. However, the court imposed conditions restricting the witness's testimony to producing assessment registers and building records related to the property, and ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 1,000 as costs to the respondent due to the delayed filing of the applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts