Antony vs George Roy Advocate - Sham Joseph — 200001/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Further evidence. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER250000072020

Further evidence

Next Hearing

18th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200007/2020

Filing Date

04-01-2020

Registration No

200001/2020

Registration Date

04-01-2020

Court

Munsiff Court, Kochi

Judge

2-Addl.Munsiff Kochi

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 26
IA/21/2025 Classification : Petition To Remove From List Section AntonyGeorge Roy
IA/22/2025 Classification : Petition Section George Roy
IA/23/2025 Classification : Petition Section George Roy
IA/24/2025 Classification : Petition Section George Roy
IA/1/2026 Classification : Commission Application Section AntonyGeorge Roy
IA/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section Antony

Petitioner(s)

Antony

Adv. Vinod K.V

Rose Mary

Respondent(s)

George Roy Advocate - Sham Joseph

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl.Munsiff Kochi

07-04-2026

Further evidence

01-04-2026

Further evidence

28-03-2026

Further evidence

24-03-2026

Further evidence

21-03-2026

for evidence.

Interim Orders

17-07-2024
Order
17-07-2024
Order

Summary: The petition to amend the suit by adding a declaration of ownership and possession to the existing prohibitory injunction suit was allowed. The court found that the amendment was consequential to the filing of a partition suit by the defendant (respondent) and was necessary to prevent multiplicity of proceedings, causing no prejudice to the respondent. The petitioner is directed to carry out the amendment within 3 days from the order date (17.07.2024). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition to amend the suit by adding a declaration of ownership and possession to the existing prohibitory injunction suit was allowed. The court found that the amendment was consequential to the filing of a partition suit by the defendant (respondent) and was necessary to prevent multiplicity of proceedings, causing no prejudice to the respondent. The petitioner is directed to carry out the amendment within 3 days from the order date (17.07.2024). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Kochi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case